Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 19011vsNIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems

See exactly how ISO 19011 controls map to NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
28
Gaps Found
9%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 19011 maps to NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems with 9% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 34 ISO 19011 controls identifies 31 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Audit Principles.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 34 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Audit Process(6 mappings)

6.5Preparing and Distributing Audit Report2 targets
NISTSP34-1Contingency Planning Policy, Programme, and Plan Coordination
NISTSP34-2Business Impact Analysis (BIA): Critical Resources, Recovery Priorities
6.6Confidentiality or non-disclosure agreements
NISTSP34-3Preventive Controls and Recovery Strategies: Backup, Alternate Sites, Equipment
6.7Conducting Audit Follow-up3 targets
NISTSP34-1Contingency Planning Policy, Programme, and Plan Coordination
NISTSP34-2Business Impact Analysis (BIA): Critical Resources, Recovery Priorities
NISTSP34-3Preventive Controls and Recovery Strategies: Backup, Alternate Sites, Equipment

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 19011 comparisons

Other NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 19011 and NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems?

ISO 19011 has 34 controls across its framework, while NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (9% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Audit Principles, where 7 ISO 19011 controls have no direct NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 19011 and NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems?

Of 34 total ISO 19011 controls, 3 map directly to NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems controls — representing 9% coverage. The remaining 31 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 19011 to NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems?

31 ISO 19011 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems. The highest concentration of gaps is in Audit Principles with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 19011 and NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems?

The domain with the highest gap count is Audit Principles (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.