ISO 13485vsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents
See exactly how ISO 13485 controls map to ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO 13485 maps to ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents with 20% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 44 ISO 13485 controls identifies 35 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Product Realisation.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 44 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 12 of 12 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
Resource Management(2 mappings)
ISO 13485: Patient Data Protection(6 mappings)
ISO 13485: Administrative Safeguards(1 mappings)
ISO 13485: Technical Safeguards(3 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ISO 13485 comparisons
Other ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO 13485 and ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents?
ISO 13485 has 44 controls across its framework, while ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents covers 37 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (20% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Product Realisation, where 7 ISO 13485 controls have no direct ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO 13485 and ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents?
Of 44 total ISO 13485 controls, 9 map directly to ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls — representing 20% coverage. The remaining 35 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 13485 to ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents?
35 ISO 13485 controls have no direct equivalent in ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents. The highest concentration of gaps is in Product Realisation with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 13485 and ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents?
The domain with the highest gap count is Product Realisation (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.