TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISMAP (Japan)vsNIST SP 800-171

See exactly how ISMAP (Japan) controls map to NIST SP 800-171. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

2
Controls Mapped
42
Gaps Found
5%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISMAP (Japan) maps to NIST SP 800-171 with 5% coverage across 0 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 44 ISMAP (Japan) controls identifies 44 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in ISMAP (Japan): Data Protection in Cloud.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 44 controls analysed | 701 frameworks | 337K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 2 of 2 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 337K+ mappings across 701 frameworks.

ISMAP Cloud Operations(2 mappings)

ISMAP-CloudOperations-Monitoring-Logging-IncidentResponse-NISC-Reporting-Vulnerability-Change-SLAISMAP Cloud Operations - Security Monitoring + SIEM + Logging + Incident Response + NISC Reporting + Vulnerability Management + Penetration Testing + Change Management + SLA Management2 targets
→3.3.1Audit Record Creation
→3.6.1Incident Response Capability

Related Comparisons

Other ISMAP (Japan) comparisons

ISMAP (Japan) vs Azure Security Benchmark20 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar20 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs NIST SP 800-19020 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs NIST SP 800-14420 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs ISO 2701820 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs ISO 2701720 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs NIST SP 800-14620 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs NIST SP 800-14520 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-171 comparisons

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs NIST SP 800-17137 mappingsNIST SP 800-207 vs NIST SP 800-1719 mappingsACSC Essential Eight vs NIST SP 800-1714 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs NIST SP 800-1712 mappingsNIST SP 800-146 vs NIST SP 800-1712 mappingsNIST SP 800-145 vs NIST SP 800-1712 mappingsNIST SP 800-144 vs NIST SP 800-1712 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs NIST SP 800-1712 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 701 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 701 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (337K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISMAP (Japan) and NIST SP 800-171?

ISMAP (Japan) has 44 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-171 covers 93 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 0 overlapping controls (5% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in ISMAP (Japan): Data Protection in Cloud, where 5 ISMAP (Japan) controls have no direct NIST SP 800-171 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISMAP (Japan) and NIST SP 800-171?

Of 44 total ISMAP (Japan) controls, 0 map directly to NIST SP 800-171 controls — representing 5% coverage. The remaining 44 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISMAP (Japan) to NIST SP 800-171?

44 ISMAP (Japan) controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-171. The highest concentration of gaps is in ISMAP (Japan): Data Protection in Cloud with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISMAP (Japan) and NIST SP 800-171?

The domain with the highest gap count is ISMAP (Japan): Data Protection in Cloud (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.