Cross-Framework Mapping

ISMAP (Japan)vsNIST SP 800-146

See exactly how ISMAP (Japan) controls map to NIST SP 800-146. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

35
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
80%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISMAP (Japan) maps to NIST SP 800-146 with 80% coverage across 20 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 ISMAP (Japan) controls identifies 5 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in ISMAP (Japan): Identity & Access in Cloud.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 35 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

ISMAP (Japan): Cloud Governance(9 mappings)

ISMAP-01Shared responsibility model definition
NIST146-01Shared responsibility model definition
ISMAP-02Cloud security policy and strategy3 targets
NIST146-02Cloud security policy and strategy
NIST146-17Container and serverless security
NIST146-21Cloud security monitoring and logging
ISMAP-03Cloud risk assessment
NIST146-03Cloud risk assessment
ISMAP-04Regulatory compliance for cloud services
NIST146-04Regulatory compliance for cloud services
ISMAP-05Cloud security roles and responsibilities3 targets
NIST146-02Cloud security policy and strategy
NIST146-17Container and serverless security
NIST146-21Cloud security monitoring and logging

ISMAP (Japan): Identity & Access in Cloud(3 mappings)

ISMAP-06Cloud identity management
NIST146-06Cloud identity management
ISMAP-07Multi-factor authentication for cloud
NIST146-07Multi-factor authentication for cloud
ISMAP-08Privileged access in cloud environments
NIST146-08Privileged access in cloud environments

ISMAP (Japan): Data Protection in Cloud(8 mappings)

ISMAP-11Data classification for cloud4 targets
NIST146-11Data classification for cloud
NIST146-12Encryption of cloud-stored data
NIST146-14Data backup and recovery in cloud
NIST146-15Secure data deletion in cloud
ISMAP-12Encryption of cloud-stored data
NIST146-12Encryption of cloud-stored data
ISMAP-14Data backup and recovery in cloud3 targets
NIST146-12Encryption of cloud-stored data
NIST146-14Data backup and recovery in cloud
NIST146-15Secure data deletion in cloud

+15 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISMAP (Japan) and NIST SP 800-146?

ISMAP (Japan) has 25 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-146 covers 25 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 20 overlapping controls (80% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in ISMAP (Japan): Identity & Access in Cloud, where 2 ISMAP (Japan) controls have no direct NIST SP 800-146 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISMAP (Japan) and NIST SP 800-146?

Of 25 total ISMAP (Japan) controls, 20 map directly to NIST SP 800-146 controls — representing 80% coverage. The remaining 5 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISMAP (Japan) to NIST SP 800-146?

5 ISMAP (Japan) controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-146. The highest concentration of gaps is in ISMAP (Japan): Identity & Access in Cloud with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISMAP (Japan) and NIST SP 800-146?

The domain with the highest gap count is ISMAP (Japan): Identity & Access in Cloud (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.