IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management)vsUK Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 (CDM 2015)
See exactly how IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) controls map to UK Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 (CDM 2015). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) maps to UK Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 (CDM 2015) with 3% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 36 IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) controls identifies 35 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Process.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 36 controls analysed | 716 frameworks | 430K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 3 of 3 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 430K+ mappings across 716 frameworks.
Operational Risk(3 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) comparisons
Other UK Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 (CDM 2015) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 716 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 716 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (430K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) and UK Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 (CDM 2015)?
IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) has 36 controls across its framework, while UK Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 (CDM 2015) covers 51 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (3% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Process, where 6 IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) controls have no direct UK Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 (CDM 2015) equivalent.
How many controls map between IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) and UK Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 (CDM 2015)?
Of 36 total IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) controls, 1 map directly to UK Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 (CDM 2015) controls — representing 3% coverage. The remaining 35 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) to UK Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 (CDM 2015)?
35 IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) controls have no direct equivalent in UK Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 (CDM 2015). The highest concentration of gaps is in Process with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) and UK Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015 (CDM 2015)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Process (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.