Cross-Framework Mapping

IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management)vsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)

See exactly how IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) controls map to South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

16
Controls Mapped
20
Gaps Found
22%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) maps to South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) with 22% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 36 IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) controls identifies 28 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Process.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 36 controls analysed | 720 frameworks | 432K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 16 of 16 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 432K+ mappings across 720 frameworks.

Financial Risk(1 mappings)

IRM-FR-2Credit and Liquidity Risk
CERT-1RRA Certification to EPA

Knowledge Management Risk(1 mappings)

IRM-KR-2Information and Data Risk
CERT-1RRA Certification to EPA

Operational Risk(2 mappings)

IRM-OR-3Supply Chain and Technology Risk2 targets
NRC73-CTL-05Supply Chain Security for CDAs
PAS1192-5-SC-02Personnel Security

Risk Management Process(8 mappings)

IRM-RP-1Risk Identification3 targets
KR-CSAP-SC-01Information Security Management
NZ-NZISM-SC-01Governance and Risk Management
NZ-NZISM-SC-03Cryptography and Cloud
IRM-RP-2Risk Analysis and Evaluation3 targets
KR-CSAP-SC-01Information Security Management
NZ-NZISM-SC-01Governance and Risk Management
NZ-NZISM-SC-03Cryptography and Cloud
IRM-RP-3Risk Treatment and Reporting
NZ-NZISM-SC-01Governance and Risk Management
IRM-RP-4Monitoring and Review
NZ-NZISM-SC-01Governance and Risk Management

Strategic Risk(4 mappings)

IRM-SR-1Strategic Risk Assessment4 targets
CERT-1RRA Certification to EPA
KR-CSAP-SC-01Information Security Management
NZ-NZISM-SC-01Governance and Risk Management
NZ-NZISM-SC-03Cryptography and Cloud

Related Comparisons

Other IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) comparisons

Other South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 720 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 720 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (432K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) and South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)?

IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) has 36 controls across its framework, while South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) covers 48 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (22% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Process, where 6 IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) controls have no direct South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) equivalent.

How many controls map between IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) and South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)?

Of 36 total IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) controls, 8 map directly to South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) controls — representing 22% coverage. The remaining 28 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) to South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)?

28 IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) controls have no direct equivalent in South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP). The highest concentration of gaps is in Process with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) and South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Process (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.