TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Indiana Consumer Data Protection ActvsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)

See exactly how Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act controls map to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
2
Gaps Found
38%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act maps to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) with 38% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act controls identifies 5 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Indiana CDPA Coord + Multi-Jurisdictional.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Indiana CDPA Controller Obligations(1 mappings)

INCDPA-Controller-PrivacyNotice-PurposeLimitation-DataMinimisation-Transparency-LawfulBasisIndiana CDPA Controller Obligations - Privacy Notice + Purpose Limitation + Data Minimisation + Transparency + Lawful Basis + Reasonable + Adequate + Relevant + Limited to What is Necessary
→AWWA-3.4Encryption and Data Protection

Indiana CDPA Security + Breach + Records(4 mappings)

INCDPA-Security-ReasonablePractices-Breach-Notification-Records-Encryption-PseudonymisationIndiana CDPA Security + Reasonable Practices + Breach Notification + Indiana Breach Notification Law (IC 24-4.9) + Records + Encryption + Pseudonymisation + De-Identification4 targets
→AWWA-2.1User Access Management
→AWWA-2.4Physical Access Controls
→AWWA-3.2Remote Access Security
→AWWA-3.4Encryption and Data Protection

Indiana CDPA Sensitive Data + DPA(1 mappings)

INCDPA-SensitiveData-Children-Consent-COPPA-DataProtectionAssessment-DPIAIndiana CDPA Sensitive Data + Consent for Sensitive Categories + Children Under 13 + COPPA Coordination + Data Protection Assessment (DPA) + High-Risk Processing
→AWWA-1.2Risk Assessment

Related Comparisons

Other Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act comparisons

Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act vs Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)6 mappingsIndiana Consumer Data Protection Act vs Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP)6 mappingsIndiana Consumer Data Protection Act vs Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data6 mappingsIndiana Consumer Data Protection Act vs Iowa Consumer Data Protection Act6 mappingsIndiana Consumer Data Protection Act vs Indonesia PDP Law6 mappingsIndiana Consumer Data Protection Act vs Bahrain PDPL6 mappingsIndiana Consumer Data Protection Act vs Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018)6 mappingsIndiana Consumer Data Protection Act vs Federal Decree-Law No. 45 of 2021 on the Protection of Personal Data (UAE PDPL)6 mappings

Other AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) comparisons

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)16 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)12 mappingsSLSA vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)11 mappingsSIG (Shared Assessments) vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)11 mappingsPTES vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)11 mappingsOWASP SAMM vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)11 mappingsOWASP MASVS vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)11 mappingsOpenSSF Scorecard vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)11 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act has 8 controls across its framework, while AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) covers 37 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Indiana CDPA Coord + Multi-Jurisdictional, where 1 Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act controls have no direct AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) equivalent.

How many controls map between Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

Of 8 total Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act controls, 3 map directly to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls — representing 38% coverage. The remaining 5 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

5 Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act controls have no direct equivalent in AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association). The highest concentration of gaps is in Indiana CDPA Coord + Multi-Jurisdictional with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Indiana Consumer Data Protection Act and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Indiana CDPA Coord + Multi-Jurisdictional (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.