TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.4)vsIAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs)

See exactly how IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.4) controls map to IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

2
Controls Mapped
40
Gaps Found
5%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.4) maps to IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs) with 5% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 42 IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.4) controls identifies 40 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Protect – IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.4).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 42 controls analysed | 1,120 frameworks | 315K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 4 of 4 control mappings across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 315K+ mappings across 1,120 frameworks.

Superseded batch representation – IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.4)(4 mappings)

IMO-MSC-FAL-Detect-AnomalyDetection-OT-IT-Monitoring-Reporting-BridgeAlarmsIMO MSC-FAL Detect Function - Anomaly Detection + OT and IT System Monitoring + Bridge Alarms + Log Aggregation + Incident Reporting Channels + Crew Observation
→ICP-24Macroprudential Surveillance and Insurance Supervision
IMO-MSC-FAL-Identify-AssetInventory-ThreatsVulnerabilities-CyberRiskAssessment-RolesResponsibilitiesIMO MSC-FAL Identify Function - OT/IT Asset Inventory + Threats + Vulnerabilities + Cyber Risk Assessment + Roles and Responsibilities + Crew + CSO + DPA3 targets
→ICP-1Objectives, Powers and Responsibilities of the Supervisor
→ICP-16Enterprise Risk Management for Solvency Purposes
→ICP-8Risk Management and Internal Controls
Coverage crosswalk

A IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.4) to IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs) crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs) controls your existing IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.4) work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.4) into IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs)
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs) into IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.4)
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.4) to IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs) (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 5% in the header counts how many IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.4) controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs) controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Related Comparisons

Other IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.4) comparisons

IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.4) vs Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8)5 mappingsIMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.4) vs IEC 624435 mappingsIMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.4) vs API 11645 mappingsIMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.4) vs IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)5 mappingsIMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.4) vs OWASP ASVS4 mappingsIMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.4) vs MITRE D3FEND4 mappingsIMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.4) vs ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents4 mappingsIMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.4) vs FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)4 mappings

Other IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs) comparisons

MTCS (Singapore) vs IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs)5 mappingsSingapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) vs IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs)5 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs)5 mappingsAuthorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards vs IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs)5 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs)4 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs)4 mappingsNERC CIP vs IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs)4 mappingsIEEE 1686 vs IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs)4 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

Cross-framework mappings across 1,120 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 1,120 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (315K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.4) and IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs)?

IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.4) has 42 controls across its framework, while IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs) covers 252 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (5% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Protect – IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.4), where 10 IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.4) controls have no direct IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs) equivalent.

How many controls map between IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.4) and IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs)?

Of 42 total IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.4) controls, 2 map directly to IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs) controls, representing 5% coverage. The remaining 40 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.4) to IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs)?

40 IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.4) controls have no direct equivalent in IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs). The highest concentration of gaps is in Protect – IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.4) with 10 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.4) and IAIS Insurance Core Principles (ICPs)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Protect – IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.4) (10 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are judged interpretations, grounded in the source text of both frameworks, and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.