Cross-Framework Mapping

IFRS 17 — Insurance ContractsvsRhode Island Data Transparency and Privacy Protection Act (RIDTPPA)

See exactly how IFRS 17 — Insurance Contracts controls map to Rhode Island Data Transparency and Privacy Protection Act (RIDTPPA). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
14
Gaps Found
14%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

IFRS 17 — Insurance Contracts maps to Rhode Island Data Transparency and Privacy Protection Act (RIDTPPA) with 14% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 22 IFRS 17 — Insurance Contracts controls identifies 19 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Scope and Definitions.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 22 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Scope and Definitions(7 mappings)

64.2003Definitions3 targets
FDBR-702Definitions (§501.702)
RIDTPPA-1Definitions
WDPA-1Definitions
Art. 2Consent Definition4 targets
CPA-CR-4Right to Data Portability
FDBR-702Definitions (§501.702)
RIDTPPA-1Definitions
WDPA-1Definitions

Disclosure(1 mappings)

IFRS17-121Nature and Extent of Risks (Para 121-132)
BSA-ENF-1Anti-Structuring Prohibition

Related Comparisons

Other IFRS 17 — Insurance Contracts comparisons

Other Rhode Island Data Transparency and Privacy Protection Act (RIDTPPA) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between IFRS 17 — Insurance Contracts and Rhode Island Data Transparency and Privacy Protection Act (RIDTPPA)?

IFRS 17 — Insurance Contracts has 22 controls across its framework, while Rhode Island Data Transparency and Privacy Protection Act (RIDTPPA) covers 63 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (14% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Scope and Definitions, where 5 IFRS 17 — Insurance Contracts controls have no direct Rhode Island Data Transparency and Privacy Protection Act (RIDTPPA) equivalent.

How many controls map between IFRS 17 — Insurance Contracts and Rhode Island Data Transparency and Privacy Protection Act (RIDTPPA)?

Of 22 total IFRS 17 — Insurance Contracts controls, 3 map directly to Rhode Island Data Transparency and Privacy Protection Act (RIDTPPA) controls — representing 14% coverage. The remaining 19 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping IFRS 17 — Insurance Contracts to Rhode Island Data Transparency and Privacy Protection Act (RIDTPPA)?

19 IFRS 17 — Insurance Contracts controls have no direct equivalent in Rhode Island Data Transparency and Privacy Protection Act (RIDTPPA). The highest concentration of gaps is in Scope and Definitions with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between IFRS 17 — Insurance Contracts and Rhode Island Data Transparency and Privacy Protection Act (RIDTPPA)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Scope and Definitions (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.