Cross-Framework Mapping

IEEE 1686vsNERC CIP

See exactly how IEEE 1686 controls map to NERC CIP. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

27
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
46%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

IEEE 1686 maps to NERC CIP with 46% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 24 IEEE 1686 controls identifies 13 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in IEEE 1686: Asset Identification & Governance.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 24 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 27 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

IEEE 1686: Access Management(1 mappings)

IEEE1686-07Personnel risk assessment
NERC-CIP-24Vulnerability assessment for critical systems

IEEE 1686: Systems Security(4 mappings)

IEEE1686-12Malware prevention for operational systems
NERC-CIP-12Malware prevention for operational systems
IEEE1686-13Network security monitoring
NERC-CIP-13Network security monitoring
IEEE1686-14System security hardening2 targets
NERC-CIP-14System security hardening
NERC-CIP-22Configuration management for OT systems

IEEE 1686: Incident Response & Recovery(10 mappings)

IEEE1686-16Incident response plan for operational disruptions3 targets
NERC-CIP-17Recovery plan for critical systems
NERC-CIP-19Coordination with sector-specific agencies
NERC-CIP-20Exercises and drills for OT incidents
IEEE1686-18Reporting obligations to authorities4 targets
NERC-CIP-17Recovery plan for critical systems
NERC-CIP-18Reporting obligations to authorities
NERC-CIP-19Coordination with sector-specific agencies
NERC-CIP-20Exercises and drills for OT incidents
IEEE1686-20Exercises and drills for OT incidents3 targets
NERC-CIP-17Recovery plan for critical systems
NERC-CIP-19Coordination with sector-specific agencies
NERC-CIP-20Exercises and drills for OT incidents

IEEE 1686: Supply Chain & Configuration(5 mappings)

IEEE1686-21Supply chain risk management for critical components4 targets
NERC-CIP-21Supply chain risk management for critical components
NERC-CIP-22Configuration management for OT systems
NERC-CIP-23Change management procedures
NERC-CIP-24Vulnerability assessment for critical systems
IEEE1686-22Configuration management for OT systems
NERC-CIP-14System security hardening

+7 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between IEEE 1686 and NERC CIP?

IEEE 1686 has 24 controls across its framework, while NERC CIP covers 13 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (46% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in IEEE 1686: Asset Identification & Governance, where 5 IEEE 1686 controls have no direct NERC CIP equivalent.

How many controls map between IEEE 1686 and NERC CIP?

Of 24 total IEEE 1686 controls, 11 map directly to NERC CIP controls — representing 46% coverage. The remaining 13 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping IEEE 1686 to NERC CIP?

13 IEEE 1686 controls have no direct equivalent in NERC CIP. The highest concentration of gaps is in IEEE 1686: Asset Identification & Governance with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between IEEE 1686 and NERC CIP?

The domain with the highest gap count is IEEE 1686: Asset Identification & Governance (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.