IEEE 1686vsISO 27019
See exactly how IEEE 1686 controls map to ISO 27019. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
IEEE 1686 maps to ISO 27019 with 67% coverage across 16 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 24 IEEE 1686 controls identifies 8 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in IEEE 1686: Asset Identification & Governance.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 24 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 39 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
IEEE 1686: Asset Identification & Governance(2 mappings)
IEEE 1686: Access Management(10 mappings)
IEEE 1686: Systems Security(5 mappings)
IEEE 1686: Incident Response & Recovery(3 mappings)
+19 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other IEEE 1686 comparisons
Other ISO 27019 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between IEEE 1686 and ISO 27019?
IEEE 1686 has 24 controls across its framework, while ISO 27019 covers 24 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 16 overlapping controls (67% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in IEEE 1686: Asset Identification & Governance, where 3 IEEE 1686 controls have no direct ISO 27019 equivalent.
How many controls map between IEEE 1686 and ISO 27019?
Of 24 total IEEE 1686 controls, 16 map directly to ISO 27019 controls — representing 67% coverage. The remaining 8 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping IEEE 1686 to ISO 27019?
8 IEEE 1686 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 27019. The highest concentration of gaps is in IEEE 1686: Asset Identification & Governance with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between IEEE 1686 and ISO 27019?
The domain with the highest gap count is IEEE 1686: Asset Identification & Governance (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.