Cross-Framework Mapping

IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication SecurityvsISO/IEC 25012:2008 - Data Quality Model

See exactly how IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security controls map to ISO/IEC 25012:2008 - Data Quality Model. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

5
Controls Mapped
29
Gaps Found
12%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security maps to ISO/IEC 25012:2008 - Data Quality Model with 12% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 34 IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security controls identifies 30 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Parts 7-9: Network Management, Access Control, and Key Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 34 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 5 of 5 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Parts 12-14: DER, Resilience, and Monitoring(3 mappings)

62351-12Resilience and security recommendations for DER
ISO-25012-4.13Availability
62351-13Cyber-physical generation and storage resilience
ISO-25012-4.13Availability
62351-14Cyber security event logging
ISO-25012-4.11Traceability

Parts 1-2: Introduction and Glossary(2 mappings)

62351-2Glossary of terms2 targets
ISO-25012-5.2Defining data quality measures
ISO-25012-5.3Planning and performing data quality evaluations

Related Comparisons

Other IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 25012:2008 - Data Quality Model comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security and ISO/IEC 25012:2008 - Data Quality Model?

IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security has 34 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 25012:2008 - Data Quality Model covers 36 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (12% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Parts 7-9: Network Management, Access Control, and Key Management, where 3 IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security controls have no direct ISO/IEC 25012:2008 - Data Quality Model equivalent.

How many controls map between IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security and ISO/IEC 25012:2008 - Data Quality Model?

Of 34 total IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security controls, 4 map directly to ISO/IEC 25012:2008 - Data Quality Model controls — representing 12% coverage. The remaining 30 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security to ISO/IEC 25012:2008 - Data Quality Model?

30 IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 25012:2008 - Data Quality Model. The highest concentration of gaps is in Parts 7-9: Network Management, Access Control, and Key Management with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security and ISO/IEC 25012:2008 - Data Quality Model?

The domain with the highest gap count is Parts 7-9: Network Management, Access Control, and Key Management (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.