IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle ProcessesvsISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management
See exactly how IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes controls map to ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes maps to ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management with 18% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 33 IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes controls identifies 40 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 9 - Software Problem Resolution Process.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 33 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
Clause 4 - General Requirements(1 mappings)
Clause 5 - Software Development Process(3 mappings)
Requirements(1 mappings)
Design(1 mappings)
Risk Management(2 mappings)
Clause 7 - Software Risk Management Process(2 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes comparisons
Other ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes and ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management?
IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes has 33 controls across its framework, while ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management covers 36 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (18% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 9 - Software Problem Resolution Process, where 8 IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes controls have no direct ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management equivalent.
How many controls map between IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes and ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management?
Of 33 total IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes controls, 10 map directly to ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management controls — representing 18% coverage. The remaining 40 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes to ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management?
40 IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 9 - Software Problem Resolution Process with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between IEC 62304:2015 Medical Device Software Lifecycle Processes and ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management?
The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 9 - Software Problem Resolution Process (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.