TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018)vsAfrican Union Malabo Convention

See exactly how Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018) controls map to African Union Malabo Convention. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

74
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
43%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018) maps to African Union Malabo Convention with 43% coverage across 18 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 42 Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018) controls identifies 26 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Chapter III — Rights of Data Subjects.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 42 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 74 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Chapter II — Conditions for Processing(8 mappings)

Art. 12Data Ownership6 targets
→Art. 19Consent Management Controls
→Art. 26Outsourcing of Personal Information Processing
→Art. 29Safety Measures
→Art. 30Privacy Policy
→Art. 34Notification of Personal Information Breach
→Art. 8Data Categories
Art. 9Free Data Sharing2 targets
→Art. 10Consent Requirements
→Art. 2Consent Definition

Chapter III — Rights of Data Subjects(10 mappings)

Art. 17Governance Structure3 targets
→Art. 2Consent Definition
→Art. 4Participating Institutions
→Art. 8Data Categories
Art. 19Consent Management Controls6 targets
→Art. 12Data Ownership
→Art. 26Outsourcing of Personal Information Processing
→Art. 29Safety Measures
→Art. 30Privacy Policy
→Art. 34Notification of Personal Information Breach
→Art. 8Data Categories
Art. 21Administrative Sanctions
→Art. 28Administrative Measures

Chapter I — General Provisions(2 mappings)

Art. 2Consent Definition2 targets
→Art. 10Consent Requirements
→Art. 4Participating Institutions

+54 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018) comparisons

Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018) vs BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience20 mappingsIceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018) vs Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014)19 mappingsIceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018) vs EU Network Code on Cybersecurity for the Electricity Sector19 mappingsIceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018) vs Uzbekistan Law on Personal Data (No. ZRU-547)19 mappingsIceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018) vs Portugal Law No. 58/2019 — Data Protection Implementation Act19 mappingsIceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018) vs Uruguay Personal Data Protection Act (Law No. 18.331)19 mappingsIceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018) vs ILO Nursing Personnel Convention C149 (1977)19 mappingsIceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018) vs 6th Anti-Money Laundering Directive (AMLD6, Directive (EU) 2018/1673)19 mappings

Other African Union Malabo Convention comparisons

BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience vs African Union Malabo Convention15 mappingsILO Nursing Personnel Convention C149 (1977) vs African Union Malabo Convention14 mappings6th Anti-Money Laundering Directive (AMLD6, Directive (EU) 2018/1673) vs African Union Malabo Convention14 mappingsISO 8000 — Data Quality vs African Union Malabo Convention14 mappingsFATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule vs African Union Malabo Convention14 mappingsPrivacy by Design (PbD) — Seven Foundational Principles vs African Union Malabo Convention14 mappingsSerbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018) vs African Union Malabo Convention14 mappingsMontenegro Law on Personal Data Protection (2023) vs African Union Malabo Convention14 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018) and African Union Malabo Convention?

Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018) has 42 controls across its framework, while African Union Malabo Convention covers 30 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 18 overlapping controls (43% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Chapter III — Rights of Data Subjects, where 9 Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018) controls have no direct African Union Malabo Convention equivalent.

How many controls map between Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018) and African Union Malabo Convention?

Of 42 total Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018) controls, 18 map directly to African Union Malabo Convention controls — representing 43% coverage. The remaining 26 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018) to African Union Malabo Convention?

26 Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018) controls have no direct equivalent in African Union Malabo Convention. The highest concentration of gaps is in Chapter III — Rights of Data Subjects with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Iceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018) and African Union Malabo Convention?

The domain with the highest gap count is Chapter III — Rights of Data Subjects (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.