TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC)vsAS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence

See exactly how ICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC) controls map to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
2
Gaps Found
40%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC) maps to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence with 40% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 10 ICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC) controls identifies 8 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in ICAO Annex 17 Chap 5 - Contingency + Response.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 10 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

ICAO Annex 17 Chap 2 - Threat + Risk + Cyber(3 mappings)

ICAO-ANX17-Chap2-ThreatAssessment-RiskManagement-Cyber-GASePICAO Annex 17 Chapter 2 - Threat Assessment + Risk Management + Cyber Threats to Critical Aviation Systems (Amendment 17/18)3 targets
→AS9100D-8.1Operational Planning and Control
→ISO27003-8.2Information Security Risk Assessment
→ISO27003-8.3Information Security Risk Treatment

ICAO Annex 17 Chap 4 - Cargo + Mail + Catering(5 mappings)

ICAO-ANX17-Chap4-Cargo-Mail-Catering-Stores-Supplies-RegulatedAgent-KnownConsignorICAO Annex 17 Chapter 4 - Cargo + Mail + Catering + Stores + Supplies Security + Regulated Agent + Known Consignor + Supply Chain5 targets
→AS9100D-8.1Operational Planning and Control
→AS9100D-8.4Control of Externally Provided Processes, Products, Services
→ISO27003-8.1Operational Planning and Control
→ISO27003-8.2Information Security Risk Assessment
→ISO27003-8.3Information Security Risk Treatment

Related Comparisons

Other ICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC) comparisons

ICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements6 mappingsICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC) vs IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security5 mappingsICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC) vs ISO/IEC 27011:20245 mappingsICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC) vs OWASP Top 10:20254 mappingsICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC) vs OWASP ASVS4 mappingsICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC) vs NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)4 mappingsICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC) vs Azure Security Benchmark4 mappingsICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC) vs Aged Care Quality Standards (Australia)4 mappings

Other AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence comparisons

AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System vs AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence16 mappingsISO/IEC 27003:2017 vs AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence16 mappingsPIC/S Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products vs AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence15 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence14 mappingsISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence vs AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence13 mappingsISO 27005 vs AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence12 mappingsISO 13485 vs AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence11 mappingsBRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 9 vs AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence10 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC) and AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

ICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC) has 10 controls across its framework, while AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence covers 62 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (40% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in ICAO Annex 17 Chap 5 - Contingency + Response, where 1 ICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC) controls have no direct AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence equivalent.

How many controls map between ICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC) and AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

Of 10 total ICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC) controls, 2 map directly to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls — representing 40% coverage. The remaining 8 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC) to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

8 ICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC) controls have no direct equivalent in AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence. The highest concentration of gaps is in ICAO Annex 17 Chap 5 - Contingency + Response with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC) and AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

The domain with the highest gap count is ICAO Annex 17 Chap 5 - Contingency + Response (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.