TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board SystemsvsUK Defence Standard 05-138 - Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers

See exactly how IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems controls map to UK Defence Standard 05-138 - Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

2
Controls Mapped
17
Gaps Found
11%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems maps to UK Defence Standard 05-138 - Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers with 11% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 19 IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems controls identifies 17 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in IACS UR E26 Survey + Approval.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 19 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 2 of 2 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

IACS UR E26 Identify - Asset Inventory + Network Architecture(1 mappings)

IACS-UR-E26-Identify-AssetInventory-CBS-NetworkArchitecture-RiskIACS UR E26 Identify Goal - Asset Inventory of Computer Based Systems + Network Architecture Documentation + Risk-Assessable Scope
→UKDEFSTD-1Cyber Defence Cyber Risk Profile (CRP)

IACS UR E26 Identify - Risk + Plan(1 mappings)

IACS-UR-E26-Identify-Plan-Risk-Survey-DocumentationIACS UR E26 Identify Goal - Ship Cyber Resilience Plan + CBS Risk Assessment + Survey + Documentation
→UKDEFSTD-1Cyber Defence Cyber Risk Profile (CRP)

Related Comparisons

Other IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems comparisons

IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems vs OWASP ASVS8 mappingsIACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems vs MITRE D3FEND8 mappingsIACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar8 mappingsIACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems vs Azure Security Benchmark8 mappingsIACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems vs BSI IT-Grundschutz8 mappingsIACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems vs NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)8 mappingsIACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)8 mappingsIACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems vs Ghana Cybersecurity Act8 mappings

Other UK Defence Standard 05-138 - Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers comparisons

OECD AI Principles vs UK Defence Standard 05-138 - Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers1 mappingsUS Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) - Higher Education Safeguards Rule vs UK Defence Standard 05-138 - Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers1 mappingsISO/IEC 27011:2024 vs UK Defence Standard 05-138 - Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers1 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs UK Defence Standard 05-138 - Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers1 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) vs UK Defence Standard 05-138 - Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers1 mappingsFDA 21 CFR Part 11 vs UK Defence Standard 05-138 - Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers1 mappingsFIRST CSIRT Services Framework and Standards vs UK Defence Standard 05-138 - Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers1 mappingsIATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual vs UK Defence Standard 05-138 - Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers1 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems and UK Defence Standard 05-138 - Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers?

IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems has 19 controls across its framework, while UK Defence Standard 05-138 - Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers covers 5 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (11% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in IACS UR E26 Survey + Approval, where 1 IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems controls have no direct UK Defence Standard 05-138 - Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers equivalent.

How many controls map between IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems and UK Defence Standard 05-138 - Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers?

Of 19 total IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems controls, 2 map directly to UK Defence Standard 05-138 - Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers controls — representing 11% coverage. The remaining 17 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems to UK Defence Standard 05-138 - Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers?

17 IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems controls have no direct equivalent in UK Defence Standard 05-138 - Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers. The highest concentration of gaps is in IACS UR E26 Survey + Approval with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems and UK Defence Standard 05-138 - Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers?

The domain with the highest gap count is IACS UR E26 Survey + Approval (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.