Cross-Framework Mapping

IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board SystemsvsNIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)

See exactly how IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems controls map to NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

24
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
42%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems maps to NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) with 42% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 19 IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems controls identifies 11 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in IACS UR E26 Survey + Approval.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 19 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 24 mapped controls across 8 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

IACS UR E26 Detect(3 mappings)

IACS-UR-E26-Detect-Logging-Monitoring-Audit-AlertingIACS UR E26 Detect Goal - Logging + Network Monitoring + Audit Trail + Alerting + SIEM3 targets
171A-AU-02Assess Audit Record Review and Reporting
171A-AU-03Assess Audit Record Protection
171A-AU-04Assess Audit Record Retention

IACS UR E26 Protect - Access + IAM(3 mappings)

IACS-UR-E26-Protect-AccessControl-Authentication-IAM-RolesIACS UR E26 Protect Goal - Access Control + Identity + Authentication + Authorization + User Management3 targets
171A-AC-02Assess Access Enforcement
171A-AC-04Assess Separation of Duties
171A-AC-06Assess Remote Access Controls

IACS UR E26 Protect - Network Segmentation(3 mappings)

IACS-UR-E26-Protect-NetworkSegmentation-Zones-Conduits-BoundaryIACS UR E26 Protect Goal - Network Segmentation + Zones + Conduits + Boundary Defence + Data Diodes3 targets
171A-AC-06Assess Remote Access Controls
171A-SC-01Assess Boundary Protection
171A-SI-03Assess System Monitoring

IACS UR E26 Protect - Remote + Wireless + Physical(3 mappings)

IACS-UR-E26-Protect-RemoteAccess-Wireless-Physical-BoundaryIACS UR E26 Protect Goal - Remote Access + Wireless + Physical Security + Boundary Protection3 targets
171A-AC-07Assess Wireless Access Controls
171A-MP-01Assess Media Protection
171A-SC-02Assess Cryptographic Protection

IACS UR E26 Respond + Recover(3 mappings)

IACS-UR-E26-Respond-Recover-IncidentResponse-Recovery-Backup-LessonsIACS UR E26 Respond + Recover Goals - Incident Response + Communication + Recovery + Backup + Lessons Learned3 targets
171A-AU-04Assess Audit Record Retention
171A-IR-01Assess Incident Handling
171A-IR-02Assess Incident Response Testing

IACS UR E27 Hardening + Communications(1 mappings)

IACS-UR-E27-Equipment-Hardening-SecureConfig-CommunicationsIACS UR E27 - Equipment Hardening + Secure Configuration + Secure Communications + Cryptography
171A-CM-01Assess Baseline Configuration

IACS UR E27 User Auth(3 mappings)

IACS-UR-E27-Equipment-UserAuth-Authentication-AuthorizationIACS UR E27 - Equipment User Authentication + Authorization + Session Management + Privileged Access3 targets
171A-AC-06Assess Remote Access Controls
171A-AC-07Assess Wireless Access Controls
171A-IA-01Assess Identification and Authentication

IACS UR E27 Logging + Forensics(1 mappings)

IACS-UR-E27-Logging-Forensics-EventCaptureIACS UR E27 - Equipment Logging + Forensic Readiness + Event Capture + Tamper Detection
171A-AU-02Assess Audit Record Review and Reporting

+4 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 718 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems and NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)?

IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems has 19 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) covers 32 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (42% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in IACS UR E26 Survey + Approval, where 1 IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems controls have no direct NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) equivalent.

How many controls map between IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems and NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)?

Of 19 total IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems controls, 8 map directly to NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) controls — representing 42% coverage. The remaining 11 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems to NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)?

11 IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI). The highest concentration of gaps is in IACS UR E26 Survey + Approval with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems and NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)?

The domain with the highest gap count is IACS UR E26 Survey + Approval (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.