Cross-Framework Mapping

Hong Kong Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance (PDPO, Cap 486)vsAustria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018)

See exactly how Hong Kong Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance (PDPO, Cap 486) controls map to Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
7
Gaps Found
15%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Hong Kong Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance (PDPO, Cap 486) maps to Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) with 15% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 13 Hong Kong Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance (PDPO, Cap 486) controls identifies 11 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in HK PDPO Enforcement + PCPD Powers.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 13 controls analysed | 706 frameworks | 324K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 324K+ mappings across 706 frameworks.

HK PDPO DPP3 Use + Direct Marketing(3 mappings)

HK-PDPO-DPP3-Use-Direct-Marketing-Consent-Section-35HK PDPO DPP3 Use Limitation Principle + Direct Marketing Prescribed Consent (Sections 35A-N)3 targets
AT-DSG-11Sections 42-45 - Data subject rights (law enforcement)
AT-DSG-13Section 36 - Scope of law enforcement processing
AT-DSG-14Section 38 - Lawfulness of law enforcement processing

HK PDPO 2021 Doxxing Amendment(3 mappings)

HK-PDPO-Doxxing-2021-Amendment-Cessation-Notices-Section-64A-DHK PDPO 2021 Anti-Doxxing Amendment - Sections 64A-D + Cessation Notices + Two-Tier Criminal Offences + Extraterritorial Reach3 targets
AT-DSG-11Sections 42-45 - Data subject rights (law enforcement)
AT-DSG-13Section 36 - Scope of law enforcement processing
AT-DSG-14Section 38 - Lawfulness of law enforcement processing

Related Comparisons

Other Hong Kong Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance (PDPO, Cap 486) comparisons

Other Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 706 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 706 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (324K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Hong Kong Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance (PDPO, Cap 486) and Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018)?

Hong Kong Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance (PDPO, Cap 486) has 13 controls across its framework, while Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) covers 14 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (15% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in HK PDPO Enforcement + PCPD Powers, where 1 Hong Kong Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance (PDPO, Cap 486) controls have no direct Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) equivalent.

How many controls map between Hong Kong Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance (PDPO, Cap 486) and Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018)?

Of 13 total Hong Kong Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance (PDPO, Cap 486) controls, 2 map directly to Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) controls — representing 15% coverage. The remaining 11 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Hong Kong Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance (PDPO, Cap 486) to Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018)?

11 Hong Kong Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance (PDPO, Cap 486) controls have no direct equivalent in Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018). The highest concentration of gaps is in HK PDPO Enforcement + PCPD Powers with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Hong Kong Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance (PDPO, Cap 486) and Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018)?

The domain with the highest gap count is HK PDPO Enforcement + PCPD Powers (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.