TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

HL7 FHIR Security FrameworkvsFIDO2 and W3C WebAuthn Standard

See exactly how HL7 FHIR Security Framework controls map to FIDO2 and W3C WebAuthn Standard. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
3
Gaps Found
31%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

HL7 FHIR Security Framework maps to FIDO2 and W3C WebAuthn Standard with 31% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 13 HL7 FHIR Security Framework controls identifies 9 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Authorization and Access Control.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 13 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Authorization and Access Control(3 mappings)

A02:2025Security Misconfiguration3 targets
→SEC-1Data Integrity Proofs
→SEC-2Enveloping Proofs
→SEC-5Channel Binding

Communications Security(1 mappings)

FHIR-SEC-1.1Transport Layer Security
→SEC-5Channel Binding

Authentication(6 mappings)

FHIR-SEC-2.1User Authentication3 targets
→SEC-1Data Integrity Proofs
→SEC-2Enveloping Proofs
→SEC-5Channel Binding
FHIR-SEC-2.3System-to-System Authentication3 targets
→SEC-1Data Integrity Proofs
→SEC-2Enveloping Proofs
→SEC-5Channel Binding

Related Comparisons

Other HL7 FHIR Security Framework comparisons

HL7 FHIR Security Framework vs Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA)11 mappingsHL7 FHIR Security Framework vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements11 mappingsHL7 FHIR Security Framework vs ETSI EN 303 64511 mappingsHL7 FHIR Security Framework vs CSA CCM v411 mappingsHL7 FHIR Security Framework vs CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model11 mappingsHL7 FHIR Security Framework vs Spain ENS11 mappingsHL7 FHIR Security Framework vs Belgium CyberFundamentals11 mappingsHL7 FHIR Security Framework vs BSIMM11 mappings

Other FIDO2 and W3C WebAuthn Standard comparisons

FDA 21 CFR Part 11 vs FIDO2 and W3C WebAuthn Standard3 mappingsCNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation) vs FIDO2 and W3C WebAuthn Standard3 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs FIDO2 and W3C WebAuthn Standard3 mappingsNIST SP 800-92 vs FIDO2 and W3C WebAuthn Standard3 mappingsNIST SP 800-124 Rev 2 — Mobile Device Security vs FIDO2 and W3C WebAuthn Standard3 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs FIDO2 and W3C WebAuthn Standard3 mappingsNIST SP 800-115 vs FIDO2 and W3C WebAuthn Standard3 mappingsISO/SAE 21434 vs FIDO2 and W3C WebAuthn Standard3 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between HL7 FHIR Security Framework and FIDO2 and W3C WebAuthn Standard?

HL7 FHIR Security Framework has 13 controls across its framework, while FIDO2 and W3C WebAuthn Standard covers 22 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (31% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Authorization and Access Control, where 4 HL7 FHIR Security Framework controls have no direct FIDO2 and W3C WebAuthn Standard equivalent.

How many controls map between HL7 FHIR Security Framework and FIDO2 and W3C WebAuthn Standard?

Of 13 total HL7 FHIR Security Framework controls, 4 map directly to FIDO2 and W3C WebAuthn Standard controls — representing 31% coverage. The remaining 9 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping HL7 FHIR Security Framework to FIDO2 and W3C WebAuthn Standard?

9 HL7 FHIR Security Framework controls have no direct equivalent in FIDO2 and W3C WebAuthn Standard. The highest concentration of gaps is in Authorization and Access Control with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between HL7 FHIR Security Framework and FIDO2 and W3C WebAuthn Standard?

The domain with the highest gap count is Authorization and Access Control (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.