CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0vsFIDO2 and W3C WebAuthn Standard
See exactly how CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls map to FIDO2 and W3C WebAuthn Standard. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 maps to FIDO2 and W3C WebAuthn Standard with 12% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 40 CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls identifies 35 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Response and Recovery.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 40 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Account Security(6 mappings)
Data Security(2 mappings)
Governance and Training(3 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 comparisons
Other FIDO2 and W3C WebAuthn Standard comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 and FIDO2 and W3C WebAuthn Standard?
CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 has 40 controls across its framework, while FIDO2 and W3C WebAuthn Standard covers 22 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (12% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Response and Recovery, where 7 CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls have no direct FIDO2 and W3C WebAuthn Standard equivalent.
How many controls map between CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 and FIDO2 and W3C WebAuthn Standard?
Of 40 total CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls, 5 map directly to FIDO2 and W3C WebAuthn Standard controls — representing 12% coverage. The remaining 35 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 to FIDO2 and W3C WebAuthn Standard?
35 CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls have no direct equivalent in FIDO2 and W3C WebAuthn Standard. The highest concentration of gaps is in Response and Recovery with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 and FIDO2 and W3C WebAuthn Standard?
The domain with the highest gap count is Response and Recovery (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.