TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

HITECH ActvsNIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)

See exactly how HITECH Act controls map to NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

15
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
27%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

HITECH Act maps to NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) with 27% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 11 HITECH Act controls identifies 8 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in HITECH 2024-2025 Pipeline: NPRM Security Rule Modernisation, Reproductive Health, Information Blocking, Sectoral Application.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 11 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 15 of 15 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

HITECH Coordination with HIPAA Privacy + Security Rules (Verified Separately) + 21st Century Cures Act + ONC(10 mappings)

HITECH-Coord-HIPAA-Privacy-Security-Cures-ONCHITECH Coordination with HIPAA Privacy Rule + HIPAA Security Rule (Verified Separately) + 21st Century Cures Act + ONC10 targets
→171A-AC-02Assess Access Enforcement
→171A-AC-04Assess Separation of Duties
→171A-AC-06Assess Remote Access Controls
→171A-AC-07Assess Wireless Access Controls
→171A-AU-02Assess Audit Record Review and Reporting
→171A-AU-03Assess Audit Record Protection
→171A-AU-04Assess Audit Record Retention
→171A-MP-01Assess Media Protection
→171A-SC-02Assess Cryptographic Protection
→171A-SC-03Assess Communications Protection

HITECH Subtitle D: Breach Notification Rule, BA Direct Liability, Subcontractors(2 mappings)

HITECH-SubtitleD-Breach-Notification-BA-Direct-LiabilityHITECH Subtitle D - Breach Notification Rule (45 CFR Part 164 Subpart D), Business Associate Direct Liability, Subcontractors2 targets
→171A-IR-01Assess Incident Handling
→171A-IR-02Assess Incident Response Testing

HITECH Subtitle D: Strengthened Individual Rights (Electronic Access, Accounting of Disclosures, Restrictions, Sale Prohibition)(3 mappings)

HITECH-SubtitleD-StrengthIndividualRightsHITECH Subtitle D - Strengthened Individual Rights (Electronic Access, Accounting of Disclosures, Restrictions, Sale Prohibition)3 targets
→171A-AC-02Assess Access Enforcement
→171A-AC-05Assess Least Privilege
→171A-IA-02Assess Multi-Factor Authentication

Related Comparisons

Other HITECH Act comparisons

HITECH Act vs Azure Security Benchmark5 mappingsHITECH Act vs Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)4 mappingsHITECH Act vs Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP)4 mappingsHITECH Act vs Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data4 mappingsHITECH Act vs India DPDP Act4 mappingsHITECH Act vs APPI4 mappingsHITECH Act vs Bahrain PDPL4 mappingsHITECH Act vs DAMA-DMBOK2 - Data Management Body of Knowledge (2nd Edition)4 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) comparisons

NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)22 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework vs NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)21 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)20 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)20 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)20 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)20 mappingsSLSA vs NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)19 mappingsSIG (Shared Assessments) vs NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)19 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between HITECH Act and NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)?

HITECH Act has 11 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) covers 32 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (27% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in HITECH 2024-2025 Pipeline: NPRM Security Rule Modernisation, Reproductive Health, Information Blocking, Sectoral Application, where 4 HITECH Act controls have no direct NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) equivalent.

How many controls map between HITECH Act and NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)?

Of 11 total HITECH Act controls, 3 map directly to NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) controls — representing 27% coverage. The remaining 8 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping HITECH Act to NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)?

8 HITECH Act controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI). The highest concentration of gaps is in HITECH 2024-2025 Pipeline: NPRM Security Rule Modernisation, Reproductive Health, Information Blocking, Sectoral Application with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between HITECH Act and NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)?

The domain with the highest gap count is HITECH 2024-2025 Pipeline: NPRM Security Rule Modernisation, Reproductive Health, Information Blocking, Sectoral Application (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.