GLBAvsISO/IEC 27007:2020
See exactly how GLBA controls map to ISO/IEC 27007:2020. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
GLBA maps to ISO/IEC 27007:2020 with 17% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 12 GLBA controls identifies 10 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in GLBA: 2024-2025 Pipeline, Coordination and Cross-Mapping to Subordinate Substantive Rules.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 12 controls analysed | 704 frameworks | 357K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 4 of 4 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 357K+ mappings across 704 frameworks.
GLBA: Subchapter I (15 USC 6801-6809) Privacy and Safeguarding Obligations(2 mappings)
GLBA: Operationalisation through FTC Safeguards Rule, FTC Privacy Rule, SEC Reg S-P(2 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other GLBA comparisons
Other ISO/IEC 27007:2020 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 704 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 704 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (357K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between GLBA and ISO/IEC 27007:2020?
GLBA has 12 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 27007:2020 covers 28 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (17% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in GLBA: 2024-2025 Pipeline, Coordination and Cross-Mapping to Subordinate Substantive Rules, where 4 GLBA controls have no direct ISO/IEC 27007:2020 equivalent.
How many controls map between GLBA and ISO/IEC 27007:2020?
Of 12 total GLBA controls, 2 map directly to ISO/IEC 27007:2020 controls — representing 17% coverage. The remaining 10 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping GLBA to ISO/IEC 27007:2020?
10 GLBA controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 27007:2020. The highest concentration of gaps is in GLBA: 2024-2025 Pipeline, Coordination and Cross-Mapping to Subordinate Substantive Rules with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between GLBA and ISO/IEC 27007:2020?
The domain with the highest gap count is GLBA: 2024-2025 Pipeline, Coordination and Cross-Mapping to Subordinate Substantive Rules (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.