Ghana Cybersecurity ActvsISO/IEC 29147:2018
See exactly how Ghana Cybersecurity Act controls map to ISO/IEC 29147:2018. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
Ghana Cybersecurity Act maps to ISO/IEC 29147:2018 with 33% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 12 Ghana Cybersecurity Act controls identifies 8 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Ghana CSA: Sectoral Coordination, Budapest Convention, Malabo Convention and 2024-2025 Status.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 12 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
Ghana CSA: Critical Information Infrastructure (CII) Designation, Plan, Audit and Risk Assessment(2 mappings)
Ghana CSA: Cybercrime Offences, Lawful Access and Preservation(1 mappings)
Ghana CSA: Sectoral Coordination, Budapest Convention, Malabo Convention and 2024-2025 Status(7 mappings)
Ghana CSA: Cybersecurity Incident Reporting (24-Hour to CSA) and National CERT-GH(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other Ghana Cybersecurity Act comparisons
Other ISO/IEC 29147:2018 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between Ghana Cybersecurity Act and ISO/IEC 29147:2018?
Ghana Cybersecurity Act has 12 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 29147:2018 covers 40 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (33% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Ghana CSA: Sectoral Coordination, Budapest Convention, Malabo Convention and 2024-2025 Status, where 5 Ghana Cybersecurity Act controls have no direct ISO/IEC 29147:2018 equivalent.
How many controls map between Ghana Cybersecurity Act and ISO/IEC 29147:2018?
Of 12 total Ghana Cybersecurity Act controls, 4 map directly to ISO/IEC 29147:2018 controls — representing 33% coverage. The remaining 8 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping Ghana Cybersecurity Act to ISO/IEC 29147:2018?
8 Ghana Cybersecurity Act controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 29147:2018. The highest concentration of gaps is in Ghana CSA: Sectoral Coordination, Budapest Convention, Malabo Convention and 2024-2025 Status with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between Ghana Cybersecurity Act and ISO/IEC 29147:2018?
The domain with the highest gap count is Ghana CSA: Sectoral Coordination, Budapest Convention, Malabo Convention and 2024-2025 Status (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.