TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

GDPRvsConsumer Data Right (CDR) Framework (Australia)

See exactly how GDPR controls map to Consumer Data Right (CDR) Framework (Australia). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

12
Controls Mapped
15
Gaps Found
19%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

GDPR maps to Consumer Data Right (CDR) Framework (Australia) with 19% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 27 GDPR controls identifies 22 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Chapter IV - Controller and Processor.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 27 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 12 of 12 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Chapter IV - Controller and Processor(2 mappings)

GDPR-Art.32Security of processing2 targets
→CDR-PS-12Privacy Safeguard 12: Security of CDR Data, and Destruction or De-identification
→CDR-RULE-SECURITYInformation Security (CDR Rules Schedule 2)

Chapter V - Transfers of Personal Data(1 mappings)

GDPR-Art.44General principle for transfers
→CDR-PS-8Privacy Safeguard 8: Overseas Disclosure of CDR Data

Chapter II - Principles(9 mappings)

GDPR-Art.5Principles relating to processing of personal data2 targets
→CDR-PS-1Privacy Safeguard 1: Open and Transparent Management of CDR Data
→CDR-PS-11Privacy Safeguard 11: Quality of CDR Data
GDPR-Art.6Lawfulness of processing2 targets
→CDR-PS-3Privacy Safeguard 3: Seeking to Collect CDR Data from CDR Participants
→CDR-PS-6Privacy Safeguard 6: Use or Disclosure of CDR Data
GDPR-Art.7Conditions for consent5 targets
→CDR-CON-1Voluntary Consent
→CDR-CON-2Express Consent
→CDR-CON-3Informed Consent
→CDR-CON-4Specific Consent
→CDR-CON-6Withdrawable Consent and Authorisation

Related Comparisons

Other GDPR comparisons

GDPR vs Federal Decree-Law No. 45 of 2021 on the Protection of Personal Data (UAE PDPL)22 mappingsGDPR vs AICPA Privacy Management Framework (PMF)20 mappingsGDPR vs Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014)18 mappingsGDPR vs APPI18 mappingsGDPR vs ISO 27001:202216 mappingsGDPR vs China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL)15 mappingsGDPR vs Australian Privacy Principles (APPs)14 mappingsGDPR vs Armenia Law on Protection of Personal Data (2015)14 mappings

Other Consumer Data Right (CDR) Framework (Australia) comparisons

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs Consumer Data Right (CDR) Framework (Australia)1 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs Consumer Data Right (CDR) Framework (Australia)1 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between GDPR and Consumer Data Right (CDR) Framework (Australia)?

GDPR has 27 controls across its framework, while Consumer Data Right (CDR) Framework (Australia) covers 33 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (19% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Chapter IV - Controller and Processor, where 14 GDPR controls have no direct Consumer Data Right (CDR) Framework (Australia) equivalent.

How many controls map between GDPR and Consumer Data Right (CDR) Framework (Australia)?

Of 27 total GDPR controls, 5 map directly to Consumer Data Right (CDR) Framework (Australia) controls — representing 19% coverage. The remaining 22 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping GDPR to Consumer Data Right (CDR) Framework (Australia)?

22 GDPR controls have no direct equivalent in Consumer Data Right (CDR) Framework (Australia). The highest concentration of gaps is in Chapter IV - Controller and Processor with 14 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between GDPR and Consumer Data Right (CDR) Framework (Australia)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Chapter IV - Controller and Processor (14 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.