Cross-Framework Mapping

GAMP 5 — Good Automated Manufacturing PracticevsAPRA CPS 220 Risk Management

See exactly how GAMP 5 — Good Automated Manufacturing Practice controls map to APRA CPS 220 Risk Management. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

12
Controls Mapped
22
Gaps Found
18%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

GAMP 5 — Good Automated Manufacturing Practice maps to APRA CPS 220 Risk Management with 18% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 34 GAMP 5 — Good Automated Manufacturing Practice controls identifies 28 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Risk Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 34 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 12 of 12 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Risk Management(12 mappings)

CDP-RM-1Risk Identification Process
CPS220-RAR-1Material Risk Identification
CDP-RM-3Value Chain Risk Assessment
CPS220-RAR-1Material Risk Identification
FAA-CS-3.1Data-Driven Risk Management3 targets
CPS220-GOV-3Three Lines of Defence
CPS220-GOV-4Risk Management Declaration
CPS220-RAR-4Risk Reporting
FAA-CS-3.2Supply Chain Risk Management3 targets
CPS220-GOV-3Three Lines of Defence
CPS220-GOV-4Risk Management Declaration
CPS220-RAR-4Risk Reporting
GAMP5-1.1Risk-Based Approach3 targets
CPS220-GOV-3Three Lines of Defence
CPS220-GOV-4Risk Management Declaration
CPS220-RAR-4Risk Reporting
GAMP5-1.2Patient Safety Risk Assessment
CPS220-RAR-1Material Risk Identification

Related Comparisons

Other GAMP 5 — Good Automated Manufacturing Practice comparisons

Other APRA CPS 220 Risk Management comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between GAMP 5 — Good Automated Manufacturing Practice and APRA CPS 220 Risk Management?

GAMP 5 — Good Automated Manufacturing Practice has 34 controls across its framework, while APRA CPS 220 Risk Management covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (18% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Risk Management, where 10 GAMP 5 — Good Automated Manufacturing Practice controls have no direct APRA CPS 220 Risk Management equivalent.

How many controls map between GAMP 5 — Good Automated Manufacturing Practice and APRA CPS 220 Risk Management?

Of 34 total GAMP 5 — Good Automated Manufacturing Practice controls, 6 map directly to APRA CPS 220 Risk Management controls — representing 18% coverage. The remaining 28 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping GAMP 5 — Good Automated Manufacturing Practice to APRA CPS 220 Risk Management?

28 GAMP 5 — Good Automated Manufacturing Practice controls have no direct equivalent in APRA CPS 220 Risk Management. The highest concentration of gaps is in Risk Management with 10 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between GAMP 5 — Good Automated Manufacturing Practice and APRA CPS 220 Risk Management?

The domain with the highest gap count is Risk Management (10 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.