Cross-Framework Mapping

FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)vsFlorida Digital Bill of Rights (SB 262)

See exactly how FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls map to Florida Digital Bill of Rights (SB 262). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
22
Gaps Found
22%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) maps to Florida Digital Bill of Rights (SB 262) with 22% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 32 FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls identifies 25 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Incident Response and Reporting.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 32 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Program Structure and Governance(2 mappings)

FTC-314.1Purpose and Scope
Sec. 501.704Exemptions
FTC-314.3Information Security Program Standards
Sec. 501.704Exemptions

Risk Assessment and Safeguard Design(3 mappings)

FTC-314.4c5Multi-Factor Authentication2 targets
Sec. 501.702Definitions
Sec. 501.711Sensitive data processing
FTC-314.4c6Secure Data Disposal
Sec. 501.708Data protection assessments

Testing, Training, and Oversight(1 mappings)

FTC-314.4dTesting and Monitoring
Sec. 501.721Surveillance exemption

Incident Response and Reporting(4 mappings)

FTC-314.5Exemption for Small Institutions
Sec. 501.704Exemptions
NGC-5.260(i)Patron and Employee Data Protection3 targets
Sec. 501.702Definitions
Sec. 501.707Controller responsibilities
Sec. 501.708Data protection assessments

Related Comparisons

Other FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons

Other Florida Digital Bill of Rights (SB 262) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and Florida Digital Bill of Rights (SB 262)?

FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) has 32 controls across its framework, while Florida Digital Bill of Rights (SB 262) covers 20 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (22% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Incident Response and Reporting, where 14 FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls have no direct Florida Digital Bill of Rights (SB 262) equivalent.

How many controls map between FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and Florida Digital Bill of Rights (SB 262)?

Of 32 total FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls, 7 map directly to Florida Digital Bill of Rights (SB 262) controls — representing 22% coverage. The remaining 25 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) to Florida Digital Bill of Rights (SB 262)?

25 FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls have no direct equivalent in Florida Digital Bill of Rights (SB 262). The highest concentration of gaps is in Incident Response and Reporting with 14 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and Florida Digital Bill of Rights (SB 262)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Incident Response and Reporting (14 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.