TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)vsDefence Security Principles Framework (DSPF)

See exactly how FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls map to Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

51
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
56%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) maps to Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) with 56% coverage across 18 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 32 FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls identifies 14 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Incident Response and Reporting.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 32 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 51 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Risk Assessment and Safeguard Design(20 mappings)

FTC-314.4bWritten Risk Assessment4 targets
→38.1051(a)General Security Requirements for DCMs
→39.18(a)General Security Requirements for DCOs
→DSPF-INFO-1Information Classification
→PSPF-INFO-2Security Classification System
FTC-314.4c1Access Controls7 targets
→AEO-PS-3Access Management
→DSPF-INFO-3Information Access Controls
→DSPF-PHYS-3Physical Access Controls
→EIOPA-GL-8Logical Security
→PSPF-PHYS-3Physical Access Controls
→SEMD-PS-2Site Security Measures
→TISAX-IS-01ISMS Requirements
FTC-314.4c3Encryption2 targets
→GLI33-4.3Data Protection and Encryption
→TISAX-IS-01ISMS Requirements
FTC-314.4c5Multi-Factor Authentication7 targets
→AEO-PS-3Access Management
→DSPF-INFO-3Information Access Controls
→DSPF-PHYS-3Physical Access Controls
→EIOPA-GL-8Logical Security
→PSPF-PHYS-3Physical Access Controls
→SEMD-PS-2Site Security Measures
→TISAX-IS-01ISMS Requirements

+31 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons

FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)22 mappingsFTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs CSA CCM v420 mappingsFTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule20 mappingsFTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange19 mappingsFTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)19 mappingsFTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)18 mappingsFTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers18 mappingsFTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs Telecommunications Sector Security Reforms (TSSR)18 mappings

Other Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) comparisons

TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF)39 mappingsProtective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 vs Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF)37 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF)36 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF)36 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF)36 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF)36 mappingsNIS2 Directive Implementing Acts vs Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF)36 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF)35 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF)?

FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) has 32 controls across its framework, while Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) covers 92 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 18 overlapping controls (56% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Incident Response and Reporting, where 6 FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls have no direct Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) equivalent.

How many controls map between FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF)?

Of 32 total FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls, 18 map directly to Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) controls — representing 56% coverage. The remaining 14 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) to Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF)?

14 FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls have no direct equivalent in Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF). The highest concentration of gaps is in Incident Response and Reporting with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Incident Response and Reporting (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.