TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)vsITU-T X.805 — Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications

See exactly how FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls map to ITU-T X.805 — Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

5
Controls Mapped
31
Gaps Found
14%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) maps to ITU-T X.805 — Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications with 14% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 36 FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls identifies 31 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Incident Response and Reporting.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 36 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 5 of 5 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Incident Response and Reporting(2 mappings)

LLOYDS-IR-03Resilience and Recovery
→X805-D7Availability
NGC-5.260(i)Patron and Employee Data Protection
→X805-D8Privacy

Purpose, Scope and Definitions(1 mappings)

Sec. 314.2(b)Definition of customer information
→X805-D8Privacy

Safeguard Elements(2 mappings)

Sec. 314.4(c)(1)Access controls
→X805-D1Access Control
Sec. 314.4(c)(5)Multi-factor authentication
→X805-D2Authentication

Related Comparisons

Other FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons

FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)22 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs CSA CCM v420 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange20 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs US Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) — Higher Education Safeguards Rule19 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)19 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments19 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management19 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)19 mappings

Other ITU-T X.805 — Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications comparisons

EU Maritime Single Window Environment Regulation (EU) 2019/1239 vs ITU-T X.805 — Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications4 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs ITU-T X.805 — Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications4 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs ITU-T X.805 — Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications4 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs ITU-T X.805 — Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications4 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework 1.0 vs ITU-T X.805 — Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications4 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0 vs ITU-T X.805 — Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications4 mappingsFTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs ITU-T X.805 — Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications4 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs ITU-T X.805 — Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications4 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and ITU-T X.805 — Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications?

FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) has 36 controls across its framework, while ITU-T X.805 — Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications covers 14 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (14% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Incident Response and Reporting, where 14 FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls have no direct ITU-T X.805 — Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications equivalent.

How many controls map between FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and ITU-T X.805 — Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications?

Of 36 total FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls, 5 map directly to ITU-T X.805 — Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications controls — representing 14% coverage. The remaining 31 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) to ITU-T X.805 — Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications?

31 FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls have no direct equivalent in ITU-T X.805 — Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications. The highest concentration of gaps is in Incident Response and Reporting with 14 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and ITU-T X.805 — Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications?

The domain with the highest gap count is Incident Response and Reporting (14 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.