Cross-Framework Mapping

CSA CCM v4vsITU-T X.805 — Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications

See exactly how CSA CCM v4 controls map to ITU-T X.805 — Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

12
Controls Mapped
159
Gaps Found
7%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CSA CCM v4 maps to ITU-T X.805 — Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications with 7% coverage across 12 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 171 CSA CCM v4 controls identifies 159 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 171 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 12 of 12 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

BCR - Business Continuity Management & Operational Resilience(3 mappings)

CSA-BCR-02Risk assessment and impact analysis
X805-D7Availability
CSA-BCR-04Business continuity planning
X805-D7Availability
CSA-BCR-05Documentation
X805-D7Availability

DSP - Data Security & Privacy Lifecycle Management(3 mappings)

CSA-DSP-01Security and privacy policy and procedures
X805-D8Privacy
CSA-DSP-08Data privacy by design and default
X805-D8Privacy
CSA-DSP-11Personal data access, reversal, rectification and deletion
X805-D8Privacy

IAM - Identity & Access Management(6 mappings)

CSA-IAM-01Identity and access management policy and procedures
X805-D1Access Control
CSA-IAM-02Strong password policy and procedures
X805-D2Authentication
CSA-IAM-11CSC authorization to tenant and service component provisioning
X805-D1Access Control
CSA-IAM-14Strong authentication
X805-D2Authentication
CSA-IAM-15Passwords management
X805-D2Authentication
CSA-IAM-16Authorization mechanisms
X805-D1Access Control

Related Comparisons

Other CSA CCM v4 comparisons

Other ITU-T X.805 — Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between CSA CCM v4 and ITU-T X.805 — Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications?

CSA CCM v4 has 171 controls across its framework, while ITU-T X.805 — Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications covers 14 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 12 overlapping controls (7% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management, where 21 CSA CCM v4 controls have no direct ITU-T X.805 — Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications equivalent.

How many controls map between CSA CCM v4 and ITU-T X.805 — Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications?

Of 171 total CSA CCM v4 controls, 12 map directly to ITU-T X.805 — Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications controls — representing 7% coverage. The remaining 159 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CSA CCM v4 to ITU-T X.805 — Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications?

159 CSA CCM v4 controls have no direct equivalent in ITU-T X.805 — Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications. The highest concentration of gaps is in CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management with 21 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CSA CCM v4 and ITU-T X.805 — Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications?

The domain with the highest gap count is CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management (21 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.