Florida Digital Bill of Rights (SB 262)vsFTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)
See exactly how Florida Digital Bill of Rights (SB 262) controls map to FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
Florida Digital Bill of Rights (SB 262) maps to FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) with 30% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 20 Florida Digital Bill of Rights (SB 262) controls identifies 14 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Protection of Children Online (Section 501.1735).
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 20 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Consumer Rights (Sections 501.701-501.706)(5 mappings)
Controller Obligations (Sections 501.707-501.711)(4 mappings)
Enforcement (Sections 501.719-501.721)(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other Florida Digital Bill of Rights (SB 262) comparisons
Other FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between Florida Digital Bill of Rights (SB 262) and FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?
Florida Digital Bill of Rights (SB 262) has 20 controls across its framework, while FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) covers 32 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (30% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Protection of Children Online (Section 501.1735), where 4 Florida Digital Bill of Rights (SB 262) controls have no direct FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) equivalent.
How many controls map between Florida Digital Bill of Rights (SB 262) and FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?
Of 20 total Florida Digital Bill of Rights (SB 262) controls, 6 map directly to FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls — representing 30% coverage. The remaining 14 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping Florida Digital Bill of Rights (SB 262) to FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?
14 Florida Digital Bill of Rights (SB 262) controls have no direct equivalent in FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). The highest concentration of gaps is in Protection of Children Online (Section 501.1735) with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between Florida Digital Bill of Rights (SB 262) and FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Protection of Children Online (Section 501.1735) (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.