TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

FCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011)vsRFC 2350 — Expectations for Computer Security Incident Response (BCP 21)

See exactly how FCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011) controls map to RFC 2350 — Expectations for Computer Security Incident Response (BCP 21). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

15
Controls Mapped
9
Gaps Found
33%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011) maps to RFC 2350 — Expectations for Computer Security Incident Response (BCP 21) with 33% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 24 FCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011) controls identifies 16 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Use and Disclosure of CPNI.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 24 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 15 of 15 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Scope and Definitions(8 mappings)

64.2003Definitions4 targets
→RFC2350-2.2Communication Channels
→RFC2350-3.1Mission Statement
→RFC2350-4.1Types of Incidents and Level of Support
→RFC2350-4.2Cooperation and Disclosure
64.2004Customer Approval Mechanisms
→RFC2350-2.2Communication Channels
Art. 2Consent Definition3 targets
→RFC2350-3.1Mission Statement
→RFC2350-4.1Types of Incidents and Level of Support
→RFC2350-4.2Cooperation and Disclosure

Safeguards and Authentication(3 mappings)

64.2010(b)Telephone Authentication
→RFC2350-4.3Communication and Authentication
64.2010(d)In-Store Authentication
→RFC2350-4.3Communication and Authentication
64.2010(e)Password and Account Protection
→RFC2350-4.3Communication and Authentication

Breach Notification Requirements(3 mappings)

64.2011(a)Definition of Breach3 targets
→RFC2350-3.1Mission Statement
→RFC2350-4.1Types of Incidents and Level of Support
→RFC2350-4.2Cooperation and Disclosure

Recordkeeping and Compliance(1 mappings)

RK-2Annual CPNI Certification
→RFC2350-2.2Communication Channels

Related Comparisons

Other FCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011) comparisons

FCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011) vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation8 mappingsFCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011) vs ISO/IEC 27400:20228 mappingsFCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011) vs GLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems8 mappingsFCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011) vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange8 mappingsFCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011) vs 3GPP 5G Security Architecture (TS 33.501)8 mappingsFCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011) vs 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security)8 mappingsFCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011) vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 57 mappingsFCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011) vs 3GPP Security6 mappings

Other RFC 2350 — Expectations for Computer Security Incident Response (BCP 21) comparisons

ISO/IEC 27400:2022 vs RFC 2350 — Expectations for Computer Security Incident Response (BCP 21)8 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs RFC 2350 — Expectations for Computer Security Incident Response (BCP 21)8 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs RFC 2350 — Expectations for Computer Security Incident Response (BCP 21)8 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs RFC 2350 — Expectations for Computer Security Incident Response (BCP 21)7 mappingsCAIQ (CSA) vs RFC 2350 — Expectations for Computer Security Incident Response (BCP 21)7 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs RFC 2350 — Expectations for Computer Security Incident Response (BCP 21)7 mappingsCISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines vs RFC 2350 — Expectations for Computer Security Incident Response (BCP 21)7 mappingsIRS Publication 1075 — Tax Information Security Guidelines vs RFC 2350 — Expectations for Computer Security Incident Response (BCP 21)7 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between FCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011) and RFC 2350 — Expectations for Computer Security Incident Response (BCP 21)?

FCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011) has 24 controls across its framework, while RFC 2350 — Expectations for Computer Security Incident Response (BCP 21) covers 18 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (33% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Use and Disclosure of CPNI, where 4 FCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011) controls have no direct RFC 2350 — Expectations for Computer Security Incident Response (BCP 21) equivalent.

How many controls map between FCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011) and RFC 2350 — Expectations for Computer Security Incident Response (BCP 21)?

Of 24 total FCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011) controls, 8 map directly to RFC 2350 — Expectations for Computer Security Incident Response (BCP 21) controls — representing 33% coverage. The remaining 16 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011) to RFC 2350 — Expectations for Computer Security Incident Response (BCP 21)?

16 FCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011) controls have no direct equivalent in RFC 2350 — Expectations for Computer Security Incident Response (BCP 21). The highest concentration of gaps is in Use and Disclosure of CPNI with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FCC Customer Proprietary Network Information (CPNI) and Data Breach Rules (47 CFR 64.2001-2011) and RFC 2350 — Expectations for Computer Security Incident Response (BCP 21)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Use and Disclosure of CPNI (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.