TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

FATF Recommendation 16 - Virtual Asset Travel RulevsNIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH

See exactly how FATF Recommendation 16 - Virtual Asset Travel Rule controls map to NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

1
Controls Mapped
12
Gaps Found
8%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FATF Recommendation 16 - Virtual Asset Travel Rule maps to NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH with 8% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 13 FATF Recommendation 16 - Virtual Asset Travel Rule controls identifies 12 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in R.16 VATR: Record Retention, Audit, Training and Status.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 13 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 1 of 1 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

R.16 VATR: Unhosted Wallet Transfers and Risk-Based Measures(1 mappings)

R.16-VATR.UnhostedUnhosted (self-hosted / non-custodial) wallet transfers - 2024 Targeted Update
→CA-9Internal System Connections

Related Comparisons

Other FATF Recommendation 16 - Virtual Asset Travel Rule comparisons

FATF Recommendation 16 - Virtual Asset Travel Rule vs Pakistan Personal Data Protection Bill 20232 mappingsFATF Recommendation 16 - Virtual Asset Travel Rule vs Italy Personal Data Protection Code (Legislative Decree No. 196/2003, amended 2018)2 mappingsFATF Recommendation 16 - Virtual Asset Travel Rule vs Federal Decree-Law No. 45 of 2021 on the Protection of Personal Data (UAE PDPL)2 mappingsFATF Recommendation 16 - Virtual Asset Travel Rule vs NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)2 mappingsFATF Recommendation 16 - Virtual Asset Travel Rule vs Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014)2 mappingsFATF Recommendation 16 - Virtual Asset Travel Rule vs ISO/IEC 29147:20182 mappingsFATF Recommendation 16 - Virtual Asset Travel Rule vs UK Defence Standard 05-138 - Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers1 mappingsFATF Recommendation 16 - Virtual Asset Travel Rule vs W3C Verifiable Credentials (VC) Data Model 2.01 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH comparisons

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH6 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH6 mappingsNIST SP 800-190 vs NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH5 mappingsISO 27017 vs NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH5 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH5 mappingsISO 27018 vs NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH5 mappingsAPI 1164 vs NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH4 mappingsBSI IT-Grundschutz vs NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH4 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between FATF Recommendation 16 - Virtual Asset Travel Rule and NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH?

FATF Recommendation 16 - Virtual Asset Travel Rule has 13 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH covers 317 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (8% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in R.16 VATR: Record Retention, Audit, Training and Status, where 3 FATF Recommendation 16 - Virtual Asset Travel Rule controls have no direct NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH equivalent.

How many controls map between FATF Recommendation 16 - Virtual Asset Travel Rule and NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH?

Of 13 total FATF Recommendation 16 - Virtual Asset Travel Rule controls, 1 map directly to NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH controls — representing 8% coverage. The remaining 12 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FATF Recommendation 16 - Virtual Asset Travel Rule to NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH?

12 FATF Recommendation 16 - Virtual Asset Travel Rule controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH. The highest concentration of gaps is in R.16 VATR: Record Retention, Audit, Training and Status with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FATF Recommendation 16 - Virtual Asset Travel Rule and NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH?

The domain with the highest gap count is R.16 VATR: Record Retention, Audit, Training and Status (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.