TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

EU Taxonomy RegulationvsEU SFDR (Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation)

See exactly how EU Taxonomy Regulation controls map to EU SFDR (Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

7
Controls Mapped
9
Gaps Found
25%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

EU Taxonomy Regulation maps to EU SFDR (Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation) with 25% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 16 EU Taxonomy Regulation controls identifies 12 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Taxonomy: Articles 20-27 Platform, Competent Authorities, Penalties, Review and Final.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 16 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 7 of 7 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Taxonomy: Articles 16-18 Enabling Activities, DNSH and Minimum Safeguards(2 mappings)

TAXO-Art.17Do No Significant Harm (DNSH) (Taxonomy Article 17)
→SFDR-Art.2(17)-DNSHDo No Significant Harm (DNSH) test for sustainable investments (Article 2(17))
TAXO-Art.18Minimum safeguards (Taxonomy Article 18) - OECD MNE + UN Guiding Principles + ILO + IBHR
→SFDR-PAI-SocialPAI Annex I Table 1 - mandatory social and governance indicators 10-14

Taxonomy: Subject Matter, Scope and Definitions(1 mappings)

TAXO-Art.1_2Subject matter, scope and definitions (Taxonomy Articles 1-2)
→SFDR-Art.1_2Subject matter, scope and definitions (SFDR Articles 1 and 2)

Taxonomy: Articles 5-7 Pre-Contractual Disclosure and SFDR Integration(4 mappings)

TAXO-Art.5_6_7Pre-contractual disclosure (Taxonomy Articles 5-7) - SFDR Article 8 / 9 product Taxonomy alignment + Article 7 negative statement4 targets
→SFDR-Art.2(17)-DNSHDo No Significant Harm (DNSH) test for sustainable investments (Article 2(17))
→SFDR-Art.8Article 8 'light-green' product disclosures - promotion of environmental or social characteristics
→SFDR-Art.9Article 9 'dark-green' product disclosures - sustainable investment objective
→SFDR-Taxonomy-IntegrationSFDR + Taxonomy Regulation integration (Articles 5-7 Taxonomy via Article 8 SFDR + Articles 8-9 SFDR Taxonomy-alignment KPIs)

Related Comparisons

Other EU Taxonomy Regulation comparisons

EU Taxonomy Regulation vs CSRD1 mappings

Other EU SFDR (Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation) comparisons

CSRD vs EU SFDR (Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation)2 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between EU Taxonomy Regulation and EU SFDR (Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation)?

EU Taxonomy Regulation has 16 controls across its framework, while EU SFDR (Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation) covers 18 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (25% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Taxonomy: Articles 20-27 Platform, Competent Authorities, Penalties, Review and Final, where 4 EU Taxonomy Regulation controls have no direct EU SFDR (Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation) equivalent.

How many controls map between EU Taxonomy Regulation and EU SFDR (Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation)?

Of 16 total EU Taxonomy Regulation controls, 4 map directly to EU SFDR (Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation) controls — representing 25% coverage. The remaining 12 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping EU Taxonomy Regulation to EU SFDR (Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation)?

12 EU Taxonomy Regulation controls have no direct equivalent in EU SFDR (Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation). The highest concentration of gaps is in Taxonomy: Articles 20-27 Platform, Competent Authorities, Penalties, Review and Final with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between EU Taxonomy Regulation and EU SFDR (Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Taxonomy: Articles 20-27 Platform, Competent Authorities, Penalties, Review and Final (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.