TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

EU SFDR (Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation)vsEU Taxonomy Regulation

See exactly how EU SFDR (Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation) controls map to EU Taxonomy Regulation. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

7
Controls Mapped
11
Gaps Found
33%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

EU SFDR (Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation) maps to EU Taxonomy Regulation with 33% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 18 EU SFDR (Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation) controls identifies 12 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in SFDR: Marketing, Cross-Cutting Rules and Final Provisions.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 18 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 7 of 7 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

SFDR: Subject Matter, Scope and Definitions(1 mappings)

SFDR-Art.1_2Subject matter, scope and definitions (SFDR Articles 1 and 2)
→TAXO-Art.1_2Subject matter, scope and definitions (Taxonomy Articles 1-2)

SFDR: Pre-Contractual Product Disclosures (Articles 6-9)(5 mappings)

SFDR-Art.2(17)-DNSHDo No Significant Harm (DNSH) test for sustainable investments (Article 2(17))2 targets
→TAXO-Art.17Do No Significant Harm (DNSH) (Taxonomy Article 17)
→TAXO-Art.5_6_7Pre-contractual disclosure (Taxonomy Articles 5-7) - SFDR Article 8 / 9 product Taxonomy alignment + Article 7 negative statement
SFDR-Art.8Article 8 'light-green' product disclosures - promotion of environmental or social characteristics
→TAXO-Art.5_6_7Pre-contractual disclosure (Taxonomy Articles 5-7) - SFDR Article 8 / 9 product Taxonomy alignment + Article 7 negative statement
SFDR-Art.9Article 9 'dark-green' product disclosures - sustainable investment objective
→TAXO-Art.5_6_7Pre-contractual disclosure (Taxonomy Articles 5-7) - SFDR Article 8 / 9 product Taxonomy alignment + Article 7 negative statement
SFDR-Taxonomy-IntegrationSFDR + Taxonomy Regulation integration (Articles 5-7 Taxonomy via Article 8 SFDR + Articles 8-9 SFDR Taxonomy-alignment KPIs)
→TAXO-Art.5_6_7Pre-contractual disclosure (Taxonomy Articles 5-7) - SFDR Article 8 / 9 product Taxonomy alignment + Article 7 negative statement

SFDR: RTS, PAI Indicators and Implementation(1 mappings)

SFDR-PAI-SocialPAI Annex I Table 1 - mandatory social and governance indicators 10-14
→TAXO-Art.18Minimum safeguards (Taxonomy Article 18) - OECD MNE + UN Guiding Principles + ILO + IBHR

Related Comparisons

Other EU SFDR (Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation) comparisons

EU SFDR (Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation) vs CSRD2 mappings

Other EU Taxonomy Regulation comparisons

CSRD vs EU Taxonomy Regulation1 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between EU SFDR (Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation) and EU Taxonomy Regulation?

EU SFDR (Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation) has 18 controls across its framework, while EU Taxonomy Regulation covers 16 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (33% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in SFDR: Marketing, Cross-Cutting Rules and Final Provisions, where 5 EU SFDR (Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation) controls have no direct EU Taxonomy Regulation equivalent.

How many controls map between EU SFDR (Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation) and EU Taxonomy Regulation?

Of 18 total EU SFDR (Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation) controls, 6 map directly to EU Taxonomy Regulation controls — representing 33% coverage. The remaining 12 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping EU SFDR (Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation) to EU Taxonomy Regulation?

12 EU SFDR (Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation) controls have no direct equivalent in EU Taxonomy Regulation. The highest concentration of gaps is in SFDR: Marketing, Cross-Cutting Rules and Final Provisions with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between EU SFDR (Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation) and EU Taxonomy Regulation?

The domain with the highest gap count is SFDR: Marketing, Cross-Cutting Rules and Final Provisions (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.