EU Payment Services Directive (PSD2) – Under ReviewvsFTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)
See exactly how EU Payment Services Directive (PSD2) – Under Review controls map to FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
EU Payment Services Directive (PSD2) – Under Review maps to FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) with 22% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 27 EU Payment Services Directive (PSD2) – Under Review controls identifies 21 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in PSR: Open Banking and Account Access.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 27 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 12 of 12 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
PSR: Transparency and Information(3 mappings)
PSR: Strong Customer Authentication and Security(6 mappings)
PSR: Consumer Protection and Fraud(3 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other EU Payment Services Directive (PSD2) – Under Review comparisons
Other FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between EU Payment Services Directive (PSD2) – Under Review and FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?
EU Payment Services Directive (PSD2) – Under Review has 27 controls across its framework, while FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) covers 32 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (22% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in PSR: Open Banking and Account Access, where 4 EU Payment Services Directive (PSD2) – Under Review controls have no direct FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) equivalent.
How many controls map between EU Payment Services Directive (PSD2) – Under Review and FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?
Of 27 total EU Payment Services Directive (PSD2) – Under Review controls, 6 map directly to FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls — representing 22% coverage. The remaining 21 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping EU Payment Services Directive (PSD2) – Under Review to FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?
21 EU Payment Services Directive (PSD2) – Under Review controls have no direct equivalent in FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). The highest concentration of gaps is in PSR: Open Banking and Account Access with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between EU Payment Services Directive (PSD2) – Under Review and FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?
The domain with the highest gap count is PSR: Open Banking and Account Access (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.