EU Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD Recast) - Directive (EU) 2024/1275vsCSRD
See exactly how EU Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD Recast) - Directive (EU) 2024/1275 controls map to CSRD. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
EU Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD Recast) - Directive (EU) 2024/1275 maps to CSRD with 14% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 21 EU Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD Recast) - Directive (EU) 2024/1275 controls identifies 18 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in EPBD - Technical Systems, Mobility, Smart Readiness and Data (Art 13-16).
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 21 controls analysed | 692 frameworks | 306K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 3 of 3 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 306K+ mappings across 692 frameworks.
EPBD - National Renovation Plan and Methodology (Art 3-6)(1 mappings)
EPBD - New and Existing Buildings + MEPS (Art 7-9)(2 mappings)
A EU Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD Recast) - Directive (EU) 2024/1275 to CSRD crosswalk, built to order
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which CSRD controls your existing EU Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD Recast) - Directive (EU) 2024/1275 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 14% in the header counts how many EU Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD Recast) - Directive (EU) 2024/1275 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many CSRD controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other EU Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD Recast) - Directive (EU) 2024/1275 comparisons
Other CSRD comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 692 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 692 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (306K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between EU Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD Recast) - Directive (EU) 2024/1275 and CSRD?
EU Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD Recast) - Directive (EU) 2024/1275 has 21 controls across its framework, while CSRD covers 22 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (14% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in EPBD - Technical Systems, Mobility, Smart Readiness and Data (Art 13-16), where 4 EU Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD Recast) - Directive (EU) 2024/1275 controls have no direct CSRD equivalent.
How many controls map between EU Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD Recast) - Directive (EU) 2024/1275 and CSRD?
Of 21 total EU Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD Recast) - Directive (EU) 2024/1275 controls, 3 map directly to CSRD controls, representing 14% coverage. The remaining 18 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping EU Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD Recast) - Directive (EU) 2024/1275 to CSRD?
18 EU Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD Recast) - Directive (EU) 2024/1275 controls have no direct equivalent in CSRD. The highest concentration of gaps is in EPBD - Technical Systems, Mobility, Smart Readiness and Data (Art 13-16) with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between EU Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD Recast) - Directive (EU) 2024/1275 and CSRD?
The domain with the highest gap count is EPBD - Technical Systems, Mobility, Smart Readiness and Data (Art 13-16) (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.