Cross-Framework Mapping

EU Clinical Trials Regulation (CTR 536/2014)vsEU Medical Devices Regulation (MDR 2017/745)

See exactly how EU Clinical Trials Regulation (CTR 536/2014) controls map to EU Medical Devices Regulation (MDR 2017/745). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

2
Controls Mapped
28
Gaps Found
7%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

EU Clinical Trials Regulation (CTR 536/2014) maps to EU Medical Devices Regulation (MDR 2017/745) with 7% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 30 EU Clinical Trials Regulation (CTR 536/2014) controls identifies 28 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in CTR - Conduct, Manufacturing and Labelling (Ch VIII-X).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 30 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 323K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 2 of 2 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 323K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.

CTR - Subject Protection and Informed Consent (Ch V)(1 mappings)

CTR-Art.28General rules on subject protection (Article 28)
MDR-Art.61_62Clinical evaluation and clinical investigations general requirements (Articles 61-62)

CTR - Start, End and Safety Reporting (Ch VI-VII)(1 mappings)

CTR-Art.41_42Adverse-event and SUSAR reporting (Articles 41-42)
MDR-Art.70_74_75_80_82Clinical-investigation application + CE-marked-device studies + substantial modifications + adverse events + records (Articles 70, 74-75, 80, 82)

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 700 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (323K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between EU Clinical Trials Regulation (CTR 536/2014) and EU Medical Devices Regulation (MDR 2017/745)?

EU Clinical Trials Regulation (CTR 536/2014) has 30 controls across its framework, while EU Medical Devices Regulation (MDR 2017/745) covers 26 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (7% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in CTR - Conduct, Manufacturing and Labelling (Ch VIII-X), where 6 EU Clinical Trials Regulation (CTR 536/2014) controls have no direct EU Medical Devices Regulation (MDR 2017/745) equivalent.

How many controls map between EU Clinical Trials Regulation (CTR 536/2014) and EU Medical Devices Regulation (MDR 2017/745)?

Of 30 total EU Clinical Trials Regulation (CTR 536/2014) controls, 2 map directly to EU Medical Devices Regulation (MDR 2017/745) controls — representing 7% coverage. The remaining 28 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping EU Clinical Trials Regulation (CTR 536/2014) to EU Medical Devices Regulation (MDR 2017/745)?

28 EU Clinical Trials Regulation (CTR 536/2014) controls have no direct equivalent in EU Medical Devices Regulation (MDR 2017/745). The highest concentration of gaps is in CTR - Conduct, Manufacturing and Labelling (Ch VIII-X) with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between EU Clinical Trials Regulation (CTR 536/2014) and EU Medical Devices Regulation (MDR 2017/745)?

The domain with the highest gap count is CTR - Conduct, Manufacturing and Labelling (Ch VIII-X) (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.