DoD Zero Trust Reference ArchitecturevsDISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs)
See exactly how DoD Zero Trust Reference Architecture controls map to DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
DoD Zero Trust Reference Architecture maps to DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) with 56% coverage across 18 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 32 DoD Zero Trust Reference Architecture controls identifies 14 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in DoD Zero Trust Reference Architecture: System & Communications Protection.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 32 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 54 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
DoD Zero Trust Reference Architecture: Access Control & Identity(16 mappings)
DoD Zero Trust Reference Architecture: System & Communications Protection(4 mappings)
+34 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other DoD Zero Trust Reference Architecture comparisons
Other DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between DoD Zero Trust Reference Architecture and DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs)?
DoD Zero Trust Reference Architecture has 32 controls across its framework, while DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) covers 32 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 18 overlapping controls (56% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in DoD Zero Trust Reference Architecture: System & Communications Protection, where 5 DoD Zero Trust Reference Architecture controls have no direct DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) equivalent.
How many controls map between DoD Zero Trust Reference Architecture and DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs)?
Of 32 total DoD Zero Trust Reference Architecture controls, 18 map directly to DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) controls — representing 56% coverage. The remaining 14 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping DoD Zero Trust Reference Architecture to DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs)?
14 DoD Zero Trust Reference Architecture controls have no direct equivalent in DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs). The highest concentration of gaps is in DoD Zero Trust Reference Architecture: System & Communications Protection with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between DoD Zero Trust Reference Architecture and DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs)?
The domain with the highest gap count is DoD Zero Trust Reference Architecture: System & Communications Protection (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.