AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)vsDISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs)
See exactly how AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls map to DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) maps to DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) with 64% coverage across 16 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls identifies 9 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Incident Response and Recovery.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 43 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Security Management and Governance(3 mappings)
Access Control and Identity Management(12 mappings)
Network and Communications Security(5 mappings)
+23 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) comparisons
Other DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) and DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs)?
AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) has 25 controls across its framework, while DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) covers 32 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 16 overlapping controls (64% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Incident Response and Recovery, where 4 AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls have no direct DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) equivalent.
How many controls map between AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) and DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs)?
Of 25 total AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls, 16 map directly to DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) controls — representing 64% coverage. The remaining 9 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) to DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs)?
9 AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls have no direct equivalent in DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs). The highest concentration of gaps is in Incident Response and Recovery with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) and DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Incident Response and Recovery (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.