Cross-Framework Mapping

DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs)vsNIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements

See exactly how DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) controls map to NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

70
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
66%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) maps to NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements with 66% coverage across 21 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 32 DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) controls identifies 11 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in General Purpose Operating Systems.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 32 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 70 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Application Security(20 mappings)

STIG-APP-001Web Server Security3 targets
171A-AC-07Assess Wireless Access Controls
171A-SC-02Assess Cryptographic Protection
171A-SC-03Assess Communications Protection
STIG-APP-002Application Server Hardening
171A-CM-01Assess Baseline Configuration
STIG-APP-003Database Security Configuration11 targets
171A-AC-02Assess Access Enforcement
171A-AC-05Assess Least Privilege
171A-AC-06Assess Remote Access Controls
171A-AC-07Assess Wireless Access Controls
171A-AU-02Assess Audit Record Review and Reporting
171A-AU-03Assess Audit Record Protection
171A-AU-04Assess Audit Record Retention
171A-IA-01Assess Identification and Authentication
171A-IA-02Assess Multi-Factor Authentication
171A-MP-01Assess Media Protection
171A-SC-02Assess Cryptographic Protection
STIG-APP-005Application Authentication and Session Management3 targets
171A-AC-06Assess Remote Access Controls
171A-AC-07Assess Wireless Access Controls
171A-IA-01Assess Identification and Authentication
STIG-APP-006Application Logging and Monitoring2 targets
171A-AU-02Assess Audit Record Review and Reporting
171A-AU-03Assess Audit Record Protection

+50 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) and NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) has 32 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements covers 32 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 21 overlapping controls (66% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in General Purpose Operating Systems, where 5 DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) controls have no direct NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) and NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

Of 32 total DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) controls, 21 map directly to NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls — representing 66% coverage. The remaining 11 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) to NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

11 DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in General Purpose Operating Systems with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) and NIST SP 800-171A — Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is General Purpose Operating Systems (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.