Cross-Framework Mapping

DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs)vsCSA CCM v4

See exactly how DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) controls map to CSA CCM v4. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

85
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
66%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) maps to CSA CCM v4 with 66% coverage across 21 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 32 DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) controls identifies 11 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in General Purpose Operating Systems.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 32 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 85 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Application Security(20 mappings)

STIG-APP-001Web Server Security3 targets
CSA-CEK-01Encryption and key management policy
CSA-CEK-18Key archival
CSA-LOG-10Encryption monitoring and reporting
STIG-APP-002Application Server Hardening3 targets
CSA-CCC-04Unauthorized change protection
CSA-CCC-08Exception management
CSA-IVS-04OS hardening and base controls
STIG-APP-003Database Security Configuration12 targets
CSA-CEK-01Encryption and key management policy
CSA-CEK-18Key archival
CSA-IAM-02Strong password policy and procedures
CSA-IAM-05Least privilege
CSA-IAM-11CSC authorization to tenant and service component provisioning
CSA-IAM-14Strong authentication
CSA-IAM-15Passwords management
CSA-IAM-16Authorization mechanisms
CSA-LOG-01Logging and monitoring policy
CSA-LOG-03Security monitoring and alerting
CSA-LOG-07Logging scope
CSA-LOG-10Encryption monitoring and reporting
STIG-APP-005Application Authentication and Session Management2 targets
CSA-IAM-02Strong password policy and procedures
CSA-IAM-14Strong authentication

+65 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) comparisons

Other CSA CCM v4 comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) and CSA CCM v4?

DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) has 32 controls across its framework, while CSA CCM v4 covers 171 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 21 overlapping controls (66% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in General Purpose Operating Systems, where 5 DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) controls have no direct CSA CCM v4 equivalent.

How many controls map between DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) and CSA CCM v4?

Of 32 total DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) controls, 21 map directly to CSA CCM v4 controls — representing 66% coverage. The remaining 11 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) to CSA CCM v4?

11 DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) controls have no direct equivalent in CSA CCM v4. The highest concentration of gaps is in General Purpose Operating Systems with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between DISA Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) and CSA CCM v4?

The domain with the highest gap count is General Purpose Operating Systems (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.