Cross-Framework Mapping

CSA CCM v4vsIEEE 1686

See exactly how CSA CCM v4 controls map to IEEE 1686. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

54
Controls Mapped
117
Gaps Found
15%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CSA CCM v4 maps to IEEE 1686 with 15% coverage across 25 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 171 CSA CCM v4 controls identifies 146 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 171 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 54 mapped controls across 12 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

BCR - Business Continuity Management & Operational Resilience(5 mappings)

CSA-BCR-02Risk assessment and impact analysis2 targets
IEEE1686-07Personnel risk assessment
IEEE1686-24Vulnerability assessment for critical systems
CSA-BCR-08Backup3 targets
IEEE1686-16Incident response plan for operational disruptions
IEEE1686-18Reporting obligations to authorities
IEEE1686-20Exercises and drills for OT incidents

CCC - Change Control and Configuration Management(6 mappings)

CSA-CCC-04Unauthorized change protection3 targets
IEEE1686-14System security hardening
IEEE1686-22Configuration management for OT systems
IEEE1686-23Change management procedures
CSA-CCC-08Exception management3 targets
IEEE1686-14System security hardening
IEEE1686-22Configuration management for OT systems
IEEE1686-23Change management procedures

CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management(5 mappings)

CSA-CEK-05Encryption change management
IEEE1686-23Change management procedures
CSA-CEK-06Encryption risk management
IEEE1686-21Supply chain risk management for critical components
CSA-CEK-20Key recovery3 targets
IEEE1686-16Incident response plan for operational disruptions
IEEE1686-18Reporting obligations to authorities
IEEE1686-20Exercises and drills for OT incidents

DSP - Data Security & Privacy Lifecycle Management(3 mappings)

CSA-DSP-04Data classification
IEEE1686-02System security categorization
CSA-DSP-09Data protection impact assessment2 targets
IEEE1686-07Personnel risk assessment
IEEE1686-24Vulnerability assessment for critical systems

GRC - Governance, Risk and Compliance(1 mappings)

CSA-GRC-02Risk management program
IEEE1686-21Supply chain risk management for critical components

+34 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between CSA CCM v4 and IEEE 1686?

CSA CCM v4 has 171 controls across its framework, while IEEE 1686 covers 24 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 25 overlapping controls (15% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management, where 18 CSA CCM v4 controls have no direct IEEE 1686 equivalent.

How many controls map between CSA CCM v4 and IEEE 1686?

Of 171 total CSA CCM v4 controls, 25 map directly to IEEE 1686 controls — representing 15% coverage. The remaining 146 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CSA CCM v4 to IEEE 1686?

146 CSA CCM v4 controls have no direct equivalent in IEEE 1686. The highest concentration of gaps is in CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management with 18 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CSA CCM v4 and IEEE 1686?

The domain with the highest gap count is CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management (18 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.