CSA CCM v4vsHL7 FHIR Security Framework
See exactly how CSA CCM v4 controls map to HL7 FHIR Security Framework. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
CSA CCM v4 maps to HL7 FHIR Security Framework with 9% coverage across 16 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 171 CSA CCM v4 controls identifies 155 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in DSP - Data Security & Privacy Lifecycle Management.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 171 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 40 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
CCC - Change Control and Configuration Management(2 mappings)
CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management(4 mappings)
IAM - Identity & Access Management(14 mappings)
+20 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other CSA CCM v4 comparisons
Other HL7 FHIR Security Framework comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between CSA CCM v4 and HL7 FHIR Security Framework?
CSA CCM v4 has 171 controls across its framework, while HL7 FHIR Security Framework covers 13 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 16 overlapping controls (9% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in DSP - Data Security & Privacy Lifecycle Management, where 19 CSA CCM v4 controls have no direct HL7 FHIR Security Framework equivalent.
How many controls map between CSA CCM v4 and HL7 FHIR Security Framework?
Of 171 total CSA CCM v4 controls, 16 map directly to HL7 FHIR Security Framework controls — representing 9% coverage. The remaining 155 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping CSA CCM v4 to HL7 FHIR Security Framework?
155 CSA CCM v4 controls have no direct equivalent in HL7 FHIR Security Framework. The highest concentration of gaps is in DSP - Data Security & Privacy Lifecycle Management with 19 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between CSA CCM v4 and HL7 FHIR Security Framework?
The domain with the highest gap count is DSP - Data Security & Privacy Lifecycle Management (19 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.