CISA Zero Trust Maturity ModelvsHL7 FHIR Security Framework
See exactly how CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model controls map to HL7 FHIR Security Framework. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model maps to HL7 FHIR Security Framework with 34% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 32 CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model controls identifies 21 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model: Risk Assessment & Management.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 32 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 25 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model: Access Control & Identity(11 mappings)
CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model: System & Communications Protection(2 mappings)
CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model: Configuration Management(3 mappings)
CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model: Audit & Accountability(4 mappings)
+5 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model comparisons
Other HL7 FHIR Security Framework comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model and HL7 FHIR Security Framework?
CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model has 32 controls across its framework, while HL7 FHIR Security Framework covers 13 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (34% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model: Risk Assessment & Management, where 5 CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model controls have no direct HL7 FHIR Security Framework equivalent.
How many controls map between CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model and HL7 FHIR Security Framework?
Of 32 total CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model controls, 11 map directly to HL7 FHIR Security Framework controls — representing 34% coverage. The remaining 21 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model to HL7 FHIR Security Framework?
21 CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model controls have no direct equivalent in HL7 FHIR Security Framework. The highest concentration of gaps is in CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model: Risk Assessment & Management with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model and HL7 FHIR Security Framework?
The domain with the highest gap count is CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model: Risk Assessment & Management (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.