COBIT 2019vsNIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems
See exactly how COBIT 2019 controls map to NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
COBIT 2019 maps to NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems with 1% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 68 COBIT 2019 controls identifies 67 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in APO - Align, Plan and Organize.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 68 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 2 of 2 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
BAI - Build, Acquire and Implement(2 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other COBIT 2019 comparisons
Other NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between COBIT 2019 and NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems?
COBIT 2019 has 68 controls across its framework, while NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (1% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in APO - Align, Plan and Organize, where 14 COBIT 2019 controls have no direct NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems equivalent.
How many controls map between COBIT 2019 and NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems?
Of 68 total COBIT 2019 controls, 1 map directly to NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems controls — representing 1% coverage. The remaining 67 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping COBIT 2019 to NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems?
67 COBIT 2019 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems. The highest concentration of gaps is in APO - Align, Plan and Organize with 14 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between COBIT 2019 and NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems?
The domain with the highest gap count is APO - Align, Plan and Organize (14 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.