Cross-Framework Mapping

CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation)vsOWASP Top 10:2025

See exactly how CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation) controls map to OWASP Top 10:2025. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

18
Controls Mapped
2
Gaps Found
35%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation) maps to OWASP Top 10:2025 with 35% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 20 CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation) controls identifies 13 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Develop.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 20 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 18 of 18 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Deploy(1 mappings)

DEP-4Host Suitability Validation
A02:2025Security Misconfiguration

Distribute(8 mappings)

DIST-2Artifact Signing4 targets
A02:2025Security Misconfiguration
A03:2025Software Supply Chain Failures
A04:2025Cryptographic Failures
AESCSF-SC-1Supply Chain Risk Management
DIST-3Registry Security2 targets
A01:2025Broken Access Control
FHIR-SEC-3.2Consent-Based Access Control
DIST-4Supply Chain Integrity2 targets
A03:2025Software Supply Chain Failures
AESCSF-SC-1Supply Chain Risk Management

Runtime: Compute and Access(6 mappings)

RUN-A1Identity and Access Management6 targets
A01:2025Broken Access Control
A02:2025Security Misconfiguration
A06:2025Insecure Design
A07:2025Authentication Failures
FHIR-SEC-3.2Consent-Based Access Control
FHIR-SEC-3.3Scope-Based Authorization

Runtime: Storage and Observability(3 mappings)

RUN-O2Incident Response Automation
A09:2025Security Logging and Alerting Failures
RUN-S1Data Encryption at Rest2 targets
A02:2025Security Misconfiguration
A04:2025Cryptographic Failures

Related Comparisons

Other CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation) comparisons

Other OWASP Top 10:2025 comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation) and OWASP Top 10:2025?

CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation) has 20 controls across its framework, while OWASP Top 10:2025 covers 16 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (35% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Develop, where 4 CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation) controls have no direct OWASP Top 10:2025 equivalent.

How many controls map between CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation) and OWASP Top 10:2025?

Of 20 total CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation) controls, 7 map directly to OWASP Top 10:2025 controls — representing 35% coverage. The remaining 13 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation) to OWASP Top 10:2025?

13 CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation) controls have no direct equivalent in OWASP Top 10:2025. The highest concentration of gaps is in Develop with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation) and OWASP Top 10:2025?

The domain with the highest gap count is Develop (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.