Cross-Framework Mapping

CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation)vsISO 27001:2022

See exactly how CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation) controls map to ISO 27001:2022. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

28
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
55%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation) maps to ISO 27001:2022 with 55% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 20 CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation) controls identifies 9 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Runtime: Compute and Access.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 20 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 28 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Deploy(2 mappings)

DEP-2Infrastructure as Code Security
ISO27001-A.5.16User identity lifecycle management
DEP-4Host Suitability Validation
ISO27001-A.8.9Secure baseline configuration management

Develop(6 mappings)

DEV-1Security Checks in Development3 targets
ISO27001-A.8.25Security-integrated development lifecycle
ISO27001-A.8.26Application-level security requirements
ISO27001-A.8.29Security validation in development and acceptance
DEV-2Peer Review3 targets
ISO27001-A.8.25Security-integrated development lifecycle
ISO27001-A.8.26Application-level security requirements
ISO27001-A.8.29Security validation in development and acceptance

Distribute(10 mappings)

DIST-1Container Image Scanning
ISO27001-A.8.7Malicious software defence
DIST-2Artifact Signing4 targets
ISO27001-A.5.19Third-party security risk management
ISO27001-A.5.20Security clauses in supplier contracts
ISO27001-A.5.22Supplier performance and change monitoring
ISO27001-A.8.24Cryptographic protection and key management
DIST-3Registry Security2 targets
ISO27001-A.5.15Logical access governance
ISO27001-A.5.3Separation of conflicting duties
DIST-4Supply Chain Integrity3 targets
ISO27001-A.5.19Third-party security risk management
ISO27001-A.5.20Security clauses in supplier contracts
ISO27001-A.5.22Supplier performance and change monitoring

Runtime: Compute and Access(2 mappings)

RUN-A1Identity and Access Management2 targets
ISO27001-A.5.15Logical access governance
ISO27001-A.5.17Credential and secret management

+8 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation) comparisons

Other ISO 27001:2022 comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation) and ISO 27001:2022?

CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation) has 20 controls across its framework, while ISO 27001:2022 covers 95 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (55% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Runtime: Compute and Access, where 3 CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation) controls have no direct ISO 27001:2022 equivalent.

How many controls map between CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation) and ISO 27001:2022?

Of 20 total CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation) controls, 11 map directly to ISO 27001:2022 controls — representing 55% coverage. The remaining 9 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation) to ISO 27001:2022?

9 CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation) controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 27001:2022. The highest concentration of gaps is in Runtime: Compute and Access with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation) and ISO 27001:2022?

The domain with the highest gap count is Runtime: Compute and Access (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.