CMMC 2.0vsFISMA
See exactly how CMMC 2.0 controls map to FISMA. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
CMMC 2.0 maps to FISMA with 62% coverage across 20 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 32 CMMC 2.0 controls identifies 12 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in CMMC 2.0: System & Communications Protection.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 32 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 52 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
CMMC 2.0: Access Control & Identity(11 mappings)
CMMC 2.0: System & Communications Protection(1 mappings)
CMMC 2.0: Risk Assessment & Management(8 mappings)
+32 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other CMMC 2.0 comparisons
Other FISMA comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between CMMC 2.0 and FISMA?
CMMC 2.0 has 32 controls across its framework, while FISMA covers 32 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 20 overlapping controls (62% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in CMMC 2.0: System & Communications Protection, where 5 CMMC 2.0 controls have no direct FISMA equivalent.
How many controls map between CMMC 2.0 and FISMA?
Of 32 total CMMC 2.0 controls, 20 map directly to FISMA controls — representing 62% coverage. The remaining 12 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping CMMC 2.0 to FISMA?
12 CMMC 2.0 controls have no direct equivalent in FISMA. The highest concentration of gaps is in CMMC 2.0: System & Communications Protection with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between CMMC 2.0 and FISMA?
The domain with the highest gap count is CMMC 2.0: System & Communications Protection (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.