Cross-Framework Mapping

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0vsTennessee Information Protection Act (TIPA)

See exactly how CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls map to Tennessee Information Protection Act (TIPA). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

23
Controls Mapped
17
Gaps Found
22%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 maps to Tennessee Information Protection Act (TIPA) with 22% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 40 CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls identifies 31 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Device Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 40 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 23 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Response and Recovery(2 mappings)

BMA-13Business Continuity and Recovery
s.6(1)Right to Deletion
CPG-7.CSystem Backups
s.6(1)Right to Deletion

Account Security(4 mappings)

CPG-1.ADefault Password Change2 targets
CTDPA-9Consent for Sensitive Data
TIPA-8Sensitive Data Consent
CPG-1.CMulti-Factor Authentication for Privileged Users2 targets
CTDPA-9Consent for Sensitive Data
TIPA-8Sensitive Data Consent

Data Security(14 mappings)

CPG-3.CSecure Sensitive Data Collection2 targets
LEB-15Penalties and Enforcement
PY-12Penalties
DS-1Security Safeguards6 targets
CPA-CO-1Privacy Notice Requirements
CPA-CO-2Purpose Limitation
CPA-CO-3Data Minimization
CPA-CR-1Right to Access
CPA-CR-2Right to Correction
CPA-CR-4Right to Data Portability
DS-2Third-Party Data Sharing Controls6 targets
CPA-CO-1Privacy Notice Requirements
CPA-CO-2Purpose Limitation
CPA-CO-3Data Minimization
CPA-CR-1Right to Access
CPA-CR-2Right to Correction
CPA-CR-4Right to Data Portability

+3 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 comparisons

Other Tennessee Information Protection Act (TIPA) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 and Tennessee Information Protection Act (TIPA)?

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 has 40 controls across its framework, while Tennessee Information Protection Act (TIPA) covers 56 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (22% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Device Security, where 6 CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls have no direct Tennessee Information Protection Act (TIPA) equivalent.

How many controls map between CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 and Tennessee Information Protection Act (TIPA)?

Of 40 total CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls, 9 map directly to Tennessee Information Protection Act (TIPA) controls — representing 22% coverage. The remaining 31 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 to Tennessee Information Protection Act (TIPA)?

31 CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls have no direct equivalent in Tennessee Information Protection Act (TIPA). The highest concentration of gaps is in Device Security with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 and Tennessee Information Protection Act (TIPA)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Device Security (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.