TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0vsOman National Cybersecurity Framework

See exactly how CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls map to Oman National Cybersecurity Framework. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

14
Controls Mapped
21
Gaps Found
29%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 maps to Oman National Cybersecurity Framework with 29% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls identifies 29 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Device Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 701 frameworks | 337K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 14 of 14 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 337K+ mappings across 701 frameworks.

Account Security(4 mappings)

CPG-1.AChanging Default Passwords
→OMANCS-3Identity and Access Management, Authentication, Privileged Access
CPG-1.CUnique Credentials2 targets
→OMANCS-3Identity and Access Management, Authentication, Privileged Access
→OMANCS-8Third-Party + Supply Chain Risk, Awareness Training, Physical Security, Compliance Audit
CPG-1.DRevoking Credentials for Departing Employees
→OMANCS-5Network, Endpoint, System Development, and Configuration Security

Data Security(3 mappings)

CPG-3.ALog Collection
→OMANCS-4Data Protection, Cryptography, and Privacy Alignment
CPG-3.BSecure Log Storage
→OMANCS-4Data Protection, Cryptography, and Privacy Alignment
CPG-3.CStrong and Agile Encryption
→OMANCS-4Data Protection, Cryptography, and Privacy Alignment

Governance & Training(2 mappings)

CPG-4.CBasic Cybersecurity Training2 targets
→OMANCS-3Identity and Access Management, Authentication, Privileged Access
→OMANCS-8Third-Party + Supply Chain Risk, Awareness Training, Physical Security, Compliance Audit

Governance and Training(2 mappings)

CPG-4.CBasic Cybersecurity Training2 targets
→OMANCS-3Identity and Access Management, Authentication, Privileged Access
→OMANCS-8Third-Party + Supply Chain Risk, Awareness Training, Physical Security, Compliance Audit

Network Segmentation(3 mappings)

CPG-8.ANetwork Segmentation2 targets
→OMANCS-3Identity and Access Management, Authentication, Privileged Access
→OMANCS-5Network, Endpoint, System Development, and Configuration Security
CPG-8.CEncrypted DNS
→OMANCS-4Data Protection, Cryptography, and Privacy Alignment

Related Comparisons

Other CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 comparisons

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar14 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs Azure Security Benchmark14 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs OWASP ASVS14 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs TISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange14 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents13 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)13 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)13 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs UK Defence Standard 05-138 - Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers13 mappings

Other Oman National Cybersecurity Framework comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) vs Oman National Cybersecurity Framework7 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs Oman National Cybersecurity Framework7 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs Oman National Cybersecurity Framework7 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs Oman National Cybersecurity Framework7 mappingsUK Defence Standard 05-138 - Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers vs Oman National Cybersecurity Framework7 mappingsRBI Cybersecurity Framework for Banks vs Oman National Cybersecurity Framework7 mappingsUK Gambling Commission - Cyber Resilience Requirements vs Oman National Cybersecurity Framework7 mappingsISO 27017 vs Oman National Cybersecurity Framework6 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 701 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 701 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (337K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 and Oman National Cybersecurity Framework?

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 has 35 controls across its framework, while Oman National Cybersecurity Framework covers 27 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (29% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Device Security, where 8 CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls have no direct Oman National Cybersecurity Framework equivalent.

How many controls map between CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 and Oman National Cybersecurity Framework?

Of 35 total CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls, 10 map directly to Oman National Cybersecurity Framework controls — representing 29% coverage. The remaining 29 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 to Oman National Cybersecurity Framework?

29 CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 controls have no direct equivalent in Oman National Cybersecurity Framework. The highest concentration of gaps is in Device Security with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 and Oman National Cybersecurity Framework?

The domain with the highest gap count is Device Security (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.